Psychometric evaluation of the Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis Symptom Assessment Form (AdvSM-SAF)

被引:6
|
作者
Taylor, Fiona [1 ]
Li, Xiaoran [1 ]
Yip, Christine [1 ]
Padilla, Brad [1 ]
Mar, Brenton [2 ]
Green, Tanya [2 ]
Oren, Ronny [2 ]
Boral, Anthony L. [2 ]
Lin, Hui-Min [2 ]
Shields, Alan L. [1 ]
Gotlib, Jason [3 ]
机构
[1] Adelphi Values, Boston, MA 02210 USA
[2] Blueprint Med, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
Psychometric evaluation; Instrument development; Patient-reported outcomes; Advanced systemic mastocytosis; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; CONTENT VALIDITY; PRO INSTRUMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.leukres.2021.106606
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The Advanced Systemic Mastocytosis Symptom Assessment Form (AdvSM-SAF) was developed to evaluate symptoms of advanced systemic mastocytosis (AdvSM). This study aimed to psychometrically evaluate AdvSM-SAF scores and provide score interpretation guidelines. Methods: The 10-item AdvSM-SAF was administered daily (scored as a seven-day average) in EXPLORER, an open-label Phase 1 study in AdvSM. Score distribution, reliability, construct-related validity, sensitivity to change, and interpretation guidelines were evaluated for AdvSM-SAF items, gastrointestinal symptom score (GSS), skin symptom score (SSS), and total symptom score (TSS). Results: Thirty-one patients contributed to the analyses. At Baseline, the GSS, SSS, and TSS had adequate internal consistency (alpha > 0.7) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients >0.7). AdvSM-SAF scores were moderately to strongly correlated with variables as expected, and distinguished among clinically distinct groups. Observed relationships between change scores in the AdvSM-SAF and other assessments reflect evidence that AdvSM-SAF scores change in concert with other assessments designed to measure similar constructs. The magnitude of AdvSM-SAF weekly TSS mean change scores based on different anchor groupings was as expected (improvement > stable > worsening). Candidate clinically meaningful between-group difference estimates (GSS = 2-4, SSS = 2-3, and TSS = 4-7 points) and within-person change estimates (GSS = 6-9, SSS = 1-4, TSS = 9-14) for AdvSM-SAF weekly scores were generated. Conclusion: The AdvSM-SAF produced reliable, construct-valid, and sensitive scores when administered in the target patient population. These results, along with its strong development history and evidence of content validity, indicate that the AdvSM-SAF is fit for the purpose of measuring treatment benefit in individuals with AdvSM.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条