Use of Molecular Tools to Identify Patients With Indolent Breast Cancers With Ultralow Risk Over 2 Decades

被引:92
作者
Esserman, Laura J. [1 ]
Yau, Christina [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, Carlie K. [1 ]
van't Veer, Laura J. [1 ]
Borowsky, Alexander D. [3 ]
Hoadley, Katherine A. [4 ]
Tobin, Nicholas P. [5 ,6 ]
Nordenskjold, Bo [7 ,8 ]
Fornander, Tommy [5 ,6 ]
Stal, Olle [7 ,8 ]
Benz, Christopher C. [1 ,2 ]
Lindstrom, Linda S. [6 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr, 1600 Divisadero St,Second Floor,POB 1710, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Buck Inst Res Aging, Novato, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Comparat Med, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
[8] Linkoping Univ, Dept Oncol, Linkoping, Sweden
[9] Karolinska Inst, Dept Biosci & Nutr, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
TERM-FOLLOW-UP; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS; ADJUVANT TAMOXIFEN; 70-GENE SIGNATURE; ENDOCRINE THERAPY; STOCKHOLM TRIAL; GENE-EXPRESSION; PROSTATE-CANCER; WOMEN; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1261
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The frequency of cancers with indolent behavior has increased with screening. Better tools to identify indolent tumors are needed to avoid overtreatment. OBJECTIVE To determine if a multigene classifier is associated with indolent behavior of invasive breast cancers in women followed for 2 decades. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of tamoxifen vs no systemic therapy, with more than 20-year follow-up. An indolent threshold (ultralow risk) of the US Food and Drug Administration-cleared MammaPrint 70-gene expression score was established above which no breast cancer deaths occurred after 15 years in the absence of systemic therapy. Immunohistochemical markers (n = 727 women) and Agilent microarrays, for MammaPrint risk scoring (n = 652 women), were performed from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor blocks. Participants were postmenopausal women with clinically detected node-negative breast cancers treated with mastectomy or lumpectomy and radiation enrolled in the Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial, 1976 to 1990. EXPOSURES After 2 years of tamoxifen vs no systemic therapy, regardless of hormone receptor status, patients without relapse who reconsented were further randomized to 3 additional years or none. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Breast cancer-specific survival assessed by Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling, adjusted for treatment, patient age, year of diagnosis, tumor size, grade, hormone receptors, and ERBB2/HER2 and Ki67 status. RESULTS In this secondary analysis of node-negative postmenopausal women, conducted in the era before mammography screening, among the 652 women with MammaPrint scoring available (median age, 62.8 years of age), 377 (58%) and 275 (42%) were MammaPrint low and high risk, respectively, while 98 (15%) were ultralow risk. At 20 years, women with 70-gene high and low tumors but not ultralow tumors had a significantly higher risk of disease-specific death compared with ultralow-risk patients by Cox analysis (hazard ratios, 4.73 [95% CI, 1.38-16.22] and 4.54 [95% CI, 1.40-14.80], respectively). There were no deaths in the ultralow-risk tamoxifen-treated arm at 15 years, and these patients had a 20-year disease-specific survival rate of 97%, whereas for untreated patients the survival rate was 94%. Recursive partitioning identified ultralow risk as the most significant predictor of good outcome. In tumors "not ultralow risk," tumor size greater than 2 cm was the most predictive of outcome. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The ultralow-risk threshold of the 70-gene MammaPrint assay can identify patients whose long-term systemic risk of death from breast cancer after surgery alone is exceedingly low.
引用
收藏
页码:1503 / 1510
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Estrogen Receptor-α Phosphorylation at Serine 305, Nuclear p21-Activated Kinase 1 Expression, and Response to Tamoxifen in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer [J].
Bostner, Josefine ;
Skoog, Lambert ;
Fornander, Tommy ;
Nordenskjold, Bo ;
Stal, Olle .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2010, 16 (05) :1624-1633
[2]   Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update [J].
Burstein, Harold J. ;
Temin, Sarah ;
Anderson, Holly ;
Buchholz, Thomas A. ;
Davidson, Nancy E. ;
Gelmon, Karen E. ;
Giordano, Sharon H. ;
Hudis, Clifford A. ;
Rowden, Diana ;
Solky, Alexander J. ;
Stearns, Vered ;
Winer, Eric P. ;
Griggs, Jennifer J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (21) :2255-+
[3]   Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer [J].
Buyse, Marc ;
Loi, Sherene ;
van't Veer, Laura ;
Viale, Giuseppe ;
Delorenzi, Mauro ;
Glas, Annuska M. ;
d'Assignies, Mahasti Saghatchian ;
Bergh, Jonas ;
Lidereau, Rosette ;
Ellis, Paul ;
Harris, Adrian ;
Bogaerts, Jan ;
Therasse, Patrick ;
Floore, Arno ;
Amakrane, Mohamed ;
Piette, Fanny ;
Rutgers, Emiel ;
Sotiriou, Christos ;
Cardoso, Fatima ;
Piccart, Martine J. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (17) :1183-1192
[4]   70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Cardoso, F. ;
van't Veer, L. J. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Slaets, L. ;
Viale, G. ;
Delaloge, S. ;
Pierga, J. -Y. ;
Brain, E. ;
Causeret, S. ;
DeLorenzi, M. ;
Glas, A. M. ;
Golfinopoulos, V. ;
Goulioti, T. ;
Knox, S. ;
Matos, E. ;
Meulemans, B. ;
Neijenhuis, P. A. ;
Nitz, U. ;
Passalacqua, R. ;
Ravdin, P. ;
Rubio, I. T. ;
Saghatchian, M. ;
Smilde, T. J. ;
Sotiriou, C. ;
Stork, L. ;
Straehle, C. ;
Thomas, G. ;
Thompson, A. M. ;
van der Hoeven, J. M. ;
Vuylsteke, P. ;
Bernards, R. ;
Tryfonidis, K. ;
Rutgers, E. ;
Piccart, M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (08) :717-729
[5]   Adherence to Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Adjuvant and Prevention Settings [J].
Chlebowski, Rowan T. ;
Kim, Jisang ;
Haque, Reina .
CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04) :378-387
[6]   A breast cancer gene signature for indolent disease [J].
Delahaye, Leonie J. M. J. ;
Drukker, Caroline A. ;
Dreezen, Christa ;
Witteveen, Anke ;
Chan, Bob ;
Snel, Mireille ;
Beumer, Ines J. ;
Bernards, Rene ;
Audeh, M. William ;
van't Veer, Laura J. ;
Glas, Annuska M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) :461-466
[7]   Gene regulatory networks: a new conceptual framework to analyse breast cancer behaviour [J].
Demicheli, R. ;
Coradini, D. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (06) :1259-1265
[8]   Tumour dormancy: findings and hypotheses from clinical research on breast cancer [J].
Demicheli, R .
SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2001, 11 (04) :297-305
[9]   Recurrence and mortality dynamics for breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy according to estrogen receptor status: Different mortality but similar recurrence [J].
Demicheli, Romano ;
Biganzoli, Elia ;
Ardoino, Ilaria ;
Boracchi, Patrizia ;
Coradini, Danila ;
Greco, Marco ;
Moliterni, Angela ;
Zambetti, Milvia ;
Valagussa, Pinuccia ;
Gukas, Isaac D. ;
Bonadonna, Gianni .
CANCER SCIENCE, 2010, 101 (03) :826-830
[10]   Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers [J].
Drukker, C. A. ;
Schmidt, M. K. ;
Rutgers, E. J. T. ;
Cardoso, F. ;
Kerlikowske, K. ;
Esserman, L. J. ;
van Leeuwen, F. E. ;
Pijnappel, R. M. ;
Slaets, L. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
van't Veer, L. J. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 144 (01) :103-111