Risk factors and clinical features of recurrent ectopic pregnancy: a case control study

被引:46
作者
Butts, S
Sammel, M
Hummel, A
Chittams, J
Barnhart, K
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Reprod Med & Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
ectopic pregnancy; recurrent; diagnosis; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02206-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare signs and symptoms between patients with recurrent and single ectopic pregnancies. Design: Case-control study. Setting: University medical center. Patient(s): Three hundred six women with single ectopic pregnancies and 61 women with recurrent ectopic pregnancies. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Risk factors, historical factors, and findings at presentation that may predispose to recurrent ectopic pregnancy. Result(s): The risk of recurrent ectopic pregnancy was increased with a history of surgery, history of live birth, and history of spontaneous miscarriage and not with a history of gonorrhea, chlamydia, pelvic inflammatory disease, Caesarean section, or pregnancy termination. Patients with a recurrent ectopic pregnancy had a nonsignificant trend toward higher initial hCG values. The majority of ultrasounds in both groups were nondiagnostic on presentation. The patients with recurrent ectopic pregnancy were less likely to have bleeding on initial presentation, though both groups had similar complaints of pain. Conclusion(s): Secondary prevention of ectopic pregnancy is problematic because of the paucity of risk factors that can be modified to diminish the odds of recurrence. Clinicians' ability to both diagnose and counsel patients at risk for recurrent ectopic pregnancy can be optimized by awareness of the clinical features of this condition. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1340 / 1344
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, MMWR Wkly, V44, P46
[2]  
BARNHART K, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P1010
[3]  
Berek JS, 1996, NOVAKS GYNECOLOGY, P495
[4]  
CUNNINGHAM FG, 2001, WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS, P885
[5]  
Goldner T E, 1993, MMWR CDC Surveill Summ, V42, P73
[6]   REPEAT ECTOPIC PREGNANCY - STUDY OF 123 CONSECUTIVE CASES [J].
HALLATT, JG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1975, 122 (04) :520-524
[7]   RECURRENCE OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY - THE ROLE OF SALPINGITIS [J].
JOESOEF, MR ;
WESTROM, L ;
REYNOLDS, G ;
MARCHBANKS, P ;
CATES, W .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (01) :46-50
[8]   SIMULATION STUDY OF CONFOUNDER-SELECTION STRATEGIES [J].
MALDONADO, G ;
GREENLAND, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (11) :923-936
[9]   DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF TUBAL PREGNANCY - EFFECT ON FERTILITY OUTCOME [J].
PAAVONEN, J ;
VARJONENTOIVONEN, M ;
KOMULAINEN, M ;
HEINONEN, PK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1985, 23 (02) :129-133
[10]  
SANDEVI R, 1987, ACTA OBSTED GYNECOL, V6, P635