The Sentence-Composition Effect: Processing of Complex Sentences Depends on the Configuration of Common Noun Phrases Versus Unusual Noun Phrases

被引:21
作者
Johnson, Marcus L. [1 ]
Lowder, Matthew W. [1 ]
Gordon, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
sentence complexity; memory; relative clauses; eye movements; list effects; EYE-MOVEMENT CONTROL; LOW-FREQUENCY WORDS; E-Z READER; RELATIVE CLAUSES; LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; LINGUISTIC COMPLEXITY; ORDER INFORMATION; CAPACITY THEORY; WORKING-MEMORY;
D O I
10.1037/a0024333
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In 2 experiments, the authors used an eye tracking while reading methodology to examine how different configurations of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases (NPs) influenced the difference in processing difficulty between sentences containing object-and subject-extracted relative clauses. Results showed that processing difficulty was reduced when the head NP was unusual relative to the embedded NP, as manipulated by lexical frequency. When both NPs were common or both were unusual, results showed strong effects of both commonness and sentence structure, but no interaction. In contrast, when 1 NP was common and the other was unusual, results showed the critical interaction. These results provide evidence for a sentence-composition effect analogous to the list-composition effect that has been well documented in memory research, in which the pattern of recall for common versus unusual items is different, depending on whether items are studied in a pure or mixed list context. This work represents an important step in integrating the list-memory and sentence-processing literatures and provides additional support for the usefulness of studying complex sentence processing from the perspective of memory-based models.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 724
页数:18
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? [J].
Baddeley, A .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (11) :417-423
[2]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[3]  
Bever T.G., 1974, EXPLAINING LINGUISTI, P173
[4]  
Brysbaert M., 2005, COGNITIVE PROCESS, P53, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198566816.003.0003
[5]   Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow [J].
Caplan, D ;
Alpert, N ;
Waters, G .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (04) :541-552
[6]   DISSOCIATION OF ALGORITHMIC AND HEURISTIC PROCESSES IN LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION - EVIDENCE FROM APHASIA [J].
CARAMAZZA, A ;
ZURIF, EB .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1976, 3 (04) :572-582
[7]  
Cohen J., 2003, APPL MULTIPLE REGRES, VThird ed., DOI 10.4324/9780203774441
[8]   The role of order information in free recall: Application to the word-frequency effect [J].
DeLosh, EL ;
McDaniel, MA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1996, 22 (05) :1136-1146
[9]   Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited [J].
Drieghe, D ;
Rayner, K ;
Pollatsek, A .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2005, 31 (05) :954-969
[10]  
DUNCAN CP, 1974, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V4, P137