Effect of time and ultrasonic activation on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on smear layer removal of the root canal

被引:4
|
作者
Linhares de Castro, Fabio Pereira [1 ,2 ]
Pinheiro, Sergio Luiz [3 ]
Hungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio [4 ]
Duque, Jussaro Alves [4 ]
Fernandes, Samuel Lucas [4 ]
Anchieta, Rodolfo Bruniera [2 ,6 ]
da Silveira Bueno, Carlos Eduardo [5 ]
机构
[1] Sao Leopoldo Mandic Fac Dent, Endodont, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ Norte Paulista UNORP, Fac Odontol UNIPOS, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Pontificia Univ Catolica Campinas, Dept Dent, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[4] Fac Morgana Potrich, Dept Clin Dent, Mineiros, Go, Brazil
[5] Sao Leopoldo Mandic Fac Dent, Dept Endodont, Campinas, SP, Brazil
[6] UNESP Univ Estadual Paulista, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Restorat Dent, Aracatuba, Brazil
关键词
dentin; EDTA; scanning electron microscopy; smear layer; IN-VITRO; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; DEBRIS REMOVAL; CITRIC-ACID; EDTA-T; DENTIN; PROTOCOLS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1002/jemt.22746
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the effect of time and the ultrasonic activation of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in removing the smear layer of at root canal. A total of 60 bovine inferior incisors were transversely sectioned and instrumented; A smear layer was added in the root dentin surface. The specimen were then divided into six groups according to the following final irrigation protocols: Group (G) 1: conventional irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); G2: conventional irrigation with NaOCl + EDTA for 20 s; G3: conventional irrigation with NaOCl + EDTA for 60 s; G4: passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) with NaOCl; G5: PUI with NaOCl + PUI with EDTA for 20 s; G6: PUI + NaOCl and PUI with EDTA for 60 s. Samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 3500 increase. The images were measured by three blinded evaluators and classified in scores ranging from 1 to 5. The results were analyzed by the Pearson correlation test and the ANOVA nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests were used for the comparisons. Irrigated samples only with NaOCl (G1 and G4) had higher scores when compared with other groups. G5 and G6, irrigated with 17% EDTA and ultrasonic irrigation had lower scores. However, there was no statistically significant difference in G2 and G3, where there was no irrigation. It was concluded that irrigation with 17% EDTA for 20 s promoted the effective removal of smear layer, regardless of ultrasonic irrigation.
引用
收藏
页码:1062 / 1068
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effectiveness of irrigation strategies on the removal of the smear layer from root canal dentin
    Neelakantan, Prasanna
    Ounsi, Hani F.
    Devaraj, Sharmila
    Cheung, Gary S. P.
    Grandini, Simone
    ODONTOLOGY, 2019, 107 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [32] Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic, etidronic and peracetic acid irrigation on human root dentine and the smear layer
    Lottanti, S.
    Gautschi, H.
    Sener, B.
    Zehnder, M.
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2009, 42 (04) : 335 - 343
  • [33] Influence of ultrasonic activation over final irrigants in the removal of photosensitizer from root canal walls after photodynamic therapy
    Souza, Matheus Albino
    Pazinatto, Bianca
    Bischoff, Karolina Frick
    Palhano, Huriel Scartazzini
    Cecchin, Doglas
    Poli de Figueiredo, Jose Antonio
    PHOTODIAGNOSIS AND PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY, 2017, 17 : 216 - 220
  • [34] Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the efficacy of 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid for smear layer removal
    Orhan, Ekim Onur
    Bahadir, Duygu
    Akgun, Ceyda
    Aktas, Seher
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2021, 84 (02) : 253 - 260
  • [35] Effect of the root canal final rinse protocols on the debris and smear layer removal and on the push-out strength of an epoxy-based sealer
    Aranda-Garcia, Arturo Javier
    Kuga, Milton Carlos
    Vitorino, Keli Regina
    Chavez-Andrade, Gisselle Moraima
    Hungaro Duarte, Marco Antonio
    Bonetti-Filho, Idomeo
    Faria, Gisele
    Reis So, Marcus Vinicius
    MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2013, 76 (05) : 533 - 537
  • [36] Canal Cleanliness and Smear Layer Removal Using Different Irrigant Activation Methods - A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study
    Das, Aishwarya
    Nasim, Iffat
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (39): : 2866 - 2869
  • [37] Smear layer removal by passive ultrasonic irrigation and 2 new mechanical methods for activation of the chelating solution
    Machado, Ricardo
    da Silva, Isadora
    Comparin, Daniel
    Marques de Mattos, Bianca Araujo
    Alberton, Luiz Romulo
    da Silva Neto, Ulisses Xavier
    RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY AND ENDODONTICS, 2021, 46 (01)
  • [38] Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Root Tip by Using Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid and Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium Garnet Laser
    Peeters, Harry Huiz
    Suardita, Ketut
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2011, 37 (11) : 1585 - 1589
  • [39] Comparative Evaluation of Different Methods of Activation of Chelating Solution for Smear Layer Removal in the Apical Portion of the Root Canal Using a Scanning Electron Microscopy: An In Vitro Study
    Alhat, Mrunal B.
    Mattigatti, Sudha B.
    Mahaparale, Rushikesh R.
    Wahane, Kapil D.
    Jadhav, Apoorva
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (08)
  • [40] Evaluation of SmearOFF, maleic acid and two EDTA preparations in smear layer removal from root canal dentin
    Ballal, Nidambur Vasudev A.
    Jain, Himanshu
    Rao, Sheetal
    Johnson, Alexander D.
    Baeten, John
    Wolcott, James F.
    ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 77 (01) : 28 - 32