A bi-scale assessing framework for aesthetic ecosystem services of villages in a world heritage site

被引:6
作者
Ding Yin-ping [1 ]
Liu Zhi-lin [1 ]
Jiao Yuan-mei [1 ]
Xu Qiu-e [1 ]
Zhang Kan-feng [1 ]
Liu Cheng-jing [1 ]
Chen Fan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yunnan Normal Univ, Fac Geog, Kunming 650500, Yunnan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Aesthetic ecosystem service; Bi-scale framework; Hani Rice Terraces; World heritage; Minority village; LANDSCAPE PERCEPTIONS; CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; VISUAL QUALITY; SOCIAL MEDIA; PREFERENCES; INDICATORS; CONSERVATION; AUTHENTICITY; BUILDINGS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11629-021-6996-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The relative spatial scale relationship of observers and ecosystem and their aesthetic dynamic interaction process are fundamental to evaluation and optimization of aesthetic ecosystem service (AES). A comprehensive and efficient framework for the assessment of AES is lack in the integration of scale relationship and dynamic process. This study took 9 villages in 4 different developmental stages (traditional, folk, rapidly changed, newly built) in Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, a world heritage site, as the research object. From two scales, viewing from inside and outside, the bi-scale assessing framework was established, which includes the three components of interaction process, connection area (as precondition of interaction), quality (as result of interaction), and influencing factors of quality (elements' characteristics of villages). Among them, the connection areas were evaluated with visual and traffic accessibility along the route. The quality and influencing factors were evaluated through participatory preferences methods by expert group. The influencing factors include 9 characteristics, such as, space size, architecture layout, vegetation species richness, color diversity. The results suggested that villages with high AES quality and low accessibility need to be optimized, and the key influencing factors are space size, architecture layout, color harmony and surrounding sanitation. Therefore, the bi-scale assessing framework can provide important references for decision making and visual protection regulations on the villages.
引用
收藏
页码:874 / 891
页数:18
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services [J].
Ala-Hulkko, Terhi ;
Kotavaara, Ossi ;
Alahuhta, Janne ;
Helle, Pekka ;
Hjort, Jan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 :416-427
[2]   APPLICATION OF WILDLAND SCENIC ASSESSMENT METHODS TO THE URBAN LANDSCAPE [J].
ANDERSON, LM ;
SCHROEDER, HW .
LANDSCAPE PLANNING, 1983, 10 (03) :219-237
[3]   THE ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL QUALITY AS A TOOL FOR THE CONSERVATION OF RURAL LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY [J].
ANGILERI, V ;
TOCCOLINI, A .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 1993, 24 (1-4) :105-112
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CULT LANDSC HONGH HA
[6]   Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Johnson, Gary W. ;
Voigt, Brian ;
Villa, Ferdinando .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 4 :117-125
[7]   THE SEARCH FOR AUTHENTICITY IN THE PILGRIM EXPERIENCE [J].
Belhassen, Yaniv ;
Caton, Kellee ;
Stewart, William P. .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (03) :668-689
[8]   The implications for visual simulation and analysis of temporal variation in the visibility of wind turbines [J].
Bishop, Ian D. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 184 :59-68
[9]  
Brehm JM., 2016, AM BEHAV SCI, V50, P165
[10]   Crowdsourcing geo-information on landscape perceptions and preferences: A review [J].
Bubalo, Martina ;
van Zanten, Boris T. ;
Verburg, Peter H. .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 184 :101-111