Limits and potential of combined folding and docking

被引:15
作者
Pozzati, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Wensi [1 ,2 ]
Bassot, Claudio [1 ,2 ]
Lamb, John [1 ,2 ]
Kundrotas, Petras [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Elofsson, Arne [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Sci Life Lab, S-17121 Solna, Sweden
[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Biochem & Biophys, S-17121 Solna, Sweden
[3] Univ Kansas, Ctr Computat Biol, Lawrence, KS 66047 USA
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
PROTEIN-PROTEIN DOCKING; DIRECT-COUPLING ANALYSIS; RESIDUE CONTACTS; STRUCTURAL BASIS; NATIVE CONTACTS; PREDICTION; COMPLEXES; RECOGNITION; CONSENSUS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btab760
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: In the last decade, de novo protein structure prediction accuracy for individual proteins has improved significantly by utilising deep learning (DL) methods for harvesting the co-evolution information from large multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). The same approach can, in principle, also be used to extract information about evolutionary-based contacts across protein-protein interfaces. However, most earlier studies have not used the latest DL methods for inter-chain contact distance prediction. This article introduces a fold-and-dock method based on predicted residue-residue distances with trRosetta. Results: The method can simultaneously predict the tertiary and quaternary structure of a protein pair, even when the structures of the monomers are not known. The straightforward application of this method to a standard dataset for protein-protein docking yielded limited success. However, using alternative methods for generating MSAs allowed us to dock accurately significantly more proteins. We also introduced a novel scoring function, PconsDock, that accurately separates 98% of correctly and incorrectly folded and docked proteins. The average performance of the method is comparable to the use of traditional, template-based or ab initio shape-complementarity-only docking methods. Moreover, the results of conventional and fold-and-dock approaches are complementary, and thus a combined docking pipeline could increase overall docking success significantly. This methodology contributed to the best model for one of the CASP14 oligomeric targets, H1065.
引用
收藏
页码:954 / 961
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Advances, Interactions, and Future Developments in the CNS, Phenix, and Rosetta Structural Biology Software Systems
    Adams, Paul D.
    Baker, David
    Brunger, Axel T.
    Das, Rhiju
    DiMaio, Frank
    Read, Randy J.
    Richardson, David C.
    Richardson, Jane S.
    Terwilliger, Thomas C.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS, VOL 42, 2013, 42 : 265 - 287
  • [2] Contact Potential for Structure Prediction of Proteins and Protein Complexes from Potts Model
    Anishchenko, Ivan
    Kundrotas, Petras J.
    Vakser, Ilya A.
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 115 (05) : 809 - 821
  • [3] Modeling complexes of modeled proteins
    Anishchenko, Ivan
    Kundrotas, Petras J.
    Vakser, Ilya A.
    [J]. PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2017, 85 (03) : 470 - 478
  • [4] Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network
    Baek, Minkyung
    DiMaio, Frank
    Anishchenko, Ivan
    Dauparas, Justas
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Lee, Gyu Rie
    Wang, Jue
    Cong, Qian
    Kinch, Lisa N.
    Schaeffer, R. Dustin
    Millan, Claudia
    Park, Hahnbeom
    Adams, Carson
    Glassman, Caleb R.
    DeGiovanni, Andy
    Pereira, Jose H.
    Rodrigues, Andria V.
    van Dijk, Alberdina A.
    Ebrecht, Ana C.
    Opperman, Diederik J.
    Sagmeister, Theo
    Buhlheller, Christoph
    Pavkov-Keller, Tea
    Rathinaswamy, Manoj K.
    Dalwadi, Udit
    Yip, Calvin K.
    Burke, John E.
    Garcia, K. Christopher
    Grishin, Nick V.
    Adams, Paul D.
    Read, Randy J.
    Baker, David
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2021, 373 (6557) : 871 - +
  • [5] The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) 2009
    Bairoch, Amos
    Consortium, UniProt
    Bougueleret, Lydie
    Altairac, Severine
    Amendolia, Valeria
    Auchincloss, Andrea
    Argoud-Puy, Ghislaine
    Axelsen, Kristian
    Baratin, Delphine
    Blatter, Marie-Claude
    Boeckmann, Brigitte
    Bolleman, Jerven
    Bollondi, Laurent
    Boutet, Emmanuel
    Quintaje, Silvia Braconi
    Breuza, Lionel
    Bridge, Alan
    deCastro, Edouard
    Ciapina, Luciane
    Coral, Danielle
    Coudert, Elisabeth
    Cusin, Isabelle
    Delbard, Gwennaelle
    Dornevil, Dolnide
    Roggli, Paula Duek
    Duvaud, Severine
    Estreicher, Anne
    Famiglietti, Livia
    Feuermann, Marc
    Gehant, Sebastian
    Farriol-Mathis, Nathalie
    Ferro, Serenella
    Gasteiger, Elisabeth
    Gateau, Alain
    Gerritsen, Vivienne
    Gos, Arnaud
    Gruaz-Gumowski, Nadine
    Hinz, Ursula
    Hulo, Chantal
    Hulo, Nicolas
    James, Janet
    Jimenez, Silvia
    Jungo, Florence
    Junker, Vivien
    Kappler, Thomas
    Keller, Guillaume
    Lachaize, Corinne
    Lane-Guermonprez, Lydie
    Langendijk-Genevaux, Petra
    Lara, Vicente
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2009, 37 : D169 - D174
  • [6] DockQ: A Quality Measure for Protein-Protein Docking Models
    Basu, Sankar
    Wallner, Bjorn
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (08):
  • [7] Inferring interaction partners from protein sequences using mutual information
    Bitbol, Anne-Florence
    [J]. PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2018, 14 (11)
  • [8] PyRosetta: a script-based interface for implementing molecular modeling algorithms using Rosetta
    Chaudhury, Sidhartha
    Lyskov, Sergey
    Gray, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 26 (05) : 689 - 691
  • [9] Protein interaction networks revealed by proteome coevolution
    Cong, Qian
    Anishchenko, Ivan
    Ovchinnikov, Sergey
    Baker, David
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6449) : 185 - +
  • [10] Simultaneous prediction of protein folding and docking at high resolution
    Das, Rhiju
    Andre, Ingemar
    Shen, Yang
    Wu, Yibing
    Lemak, Alexander
    Bansal, Sonal
    Arrowsmith, Cheryl H.
    Szyperski, Thomas
    Baker, David
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (45) : 18978 - 18983