Production of greenhouse-grown biocrust mosses and associated cyanobacteria to rehabilitate dryland soil function

被引:108
作者
Antoninka, Anita [1 ]
Bowker, Matthew A. [1 ,2 ]
Reed, Sasha C. [3 ]
Doherty, Kyle [2 ]
机构
[1] No Arizona Univ, Sch Forestry, 200 East Pine Knoll Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Southwest Biol Sci Ctr, 2255 North Gemini Dr, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Southwest Biol Sci Ctr, 2290 Southwest Resource Blvd, Moab, UT 84532 USA
关键词
biocrust cultivation; biological soil crust; C and nitrogen fixation; dryland rehabilitation technology; dryland restoration material; Syntrichia spp; DESICCATION-TOLERANCE; NITROGEN-FIXATION; ARTIFICIAL CULTURE; CRUSTS; BRYOPHYTES; RECOVERY; DESERT; INFILTRATION; FERTILIZATION; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1111/rec.12311
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Mosses are an often-overlooked component of dryland ecosystems, yet they are common members of biological soil crust communities (biocrusts) and provide key ecosystem services, including soil stabilization, water retention, carbon fixation, and housing of N-2 fixing cyanobacteria. Mosses are able to survive long dry periods, respond rapidly to precipitation, and reproduce vegetatively. With these qualities, drylandmosses have the potential to be an excellent dryland restoration material. Unfortunately, dryland mosses are often slow growing in nature, and ex situ cultivation methods are needed to enhance their utility. Our goal was to determine how to rapidly produce, vegetatively, Syntrichia caninervis and S. ruralis, common and abundant moss species in drylands of North America and elsewhere, in a greenhouse. We manipulated the length of hydration on a weekly schedule (5, 4, 3, or 2 days continuous hydration per week), crossed with fertilization (once at the beginning, monthly, biweekly, or not at all). Moss biomass increased sixfold for both species in 4 months, an increase that would require years under dryland field conditions. Both moss species preferred short hydration and monthly fertilizer. Remarkably, we also unintentionally cultured a variety of other important biocrust organisms, including cyanobacteria and lichens. In only 6 months, we produced functionally mature biocrusts, as evidenced by high productivity and ecosystem-relevant levels of N-2 fixation. Our results suggest that biocrust mossesmight be the ideal candidate for biocrust cultivation for restoration purposes. With optimization, these methods are the first step in developing a moss-based biocrust rehabilitation technology.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 335
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RANGELAND DESERTIFIC
[2]  
Bainbridge DavidA., 2007, A Guide for Desert and Dryland Restoration
[3]  
BELNAP J, 1993, GREAT BASIN NAT, V53, P89
[4]   Vulnerability of desert biological soil crusts to wind erosion: the influences of crust development, soil texture, and disturbance [J].
Belnap, J ;
Gillette, DA .
JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1998, 39 (02) :133-142
[5]  
Belnap J, 2001, ECOL STU AN, V150, P363
[6]   Patton's tracks in the Mojave Desert, USA: An ecological legacy [J].
Belnap, J ;
Warren, SD .
ARID LAND RESEARCH AND MANAGEMENT, 2002, 16 (03) :245-258
[7]   Nitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts from southeast Utah, USA [J].
Belnap, J .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2002, 35 (02) :128-135
[8]   Soil surface disturbances in cold deserts: Effects on nitrogenase activity in cyanobacterial-lichen soil crusts [J].
Belnap, J .
BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 1996, 23 (04) :362-367
[9]   Threshold concepts and their use in rangeland management and restoration: The good, the bad, and the insidious [J].
Bestelmeyer, Brandon T. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2006, 14 (03) :325-329
[10]   Revisiting classic water erosion models in drylands: The strong impact of biological soil crusts [J].
Bowker, Matthew A. ;
Belnap, Jayne ;
Chaudhary, V. Bala ;
Johnson, Nancy C. .
SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY, 2008, 40 (09) :2309-2316