Students' Responses to Learning Management Systems in a Blended Learning Context

被引:5
作者
Attuquayefio, Samuel NiiBoi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Profess Studies, Accra, Ghana
关键词
Anxiety; Blended Learning; Effort Expectancy; Performance Expectancy; Satisfaction; Social Influence; UTAUT; 2; UNIFIED THEORY; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; ACCEPTANCE; MODEL; ADOPTION; SATISFACTION; ATTITUDE; QUALITY; ONLINE;
D O I
10.4018/IJOPCD.293208
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to examine first-year students' behaviour towards learning management systems in a blended learning environment. The study employed a convenient sampling technique for data collection, and SmartPLS3 was used to analyse the data. There were 671 first-year students from the University of Professional Studies Accra who participated in the survey. The findings of the study revealed that social influence, price value, and anxiety significantly influence behavioural intention to use learning management systems (LMS). However, the relationship between anxiety and behavioural intention is inverse. Furthermore, anxiety significantly impacts effort expectancy, while effort expectancy also impacts satisfaction. Additionally, the results suggest that satisfaction fully mediates the relationship between effort expectancy and behavioural intention to use LMS. Administrators of higher education must ensure that the performance of the LMS exceeds the expectations of students so as to formulate the intention to use it for learning.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students' Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios [J].
Abdullah, Fazil ;
Ward, Rupert ;
Ahmed, Ejaz .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 63 :75-90
[2]   Students' readiness for blended learning in a leading Malaysian private higher education institution [J].
Adams, Donnie ;
Tan, Mabel Hwee Joo ;
Sumintono, Bambang .
INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND SMART EDUCATION, 2021, 18 (04) :515-534
[3]  
Adenuga K.I., 2019, INT WORK C TRANSF DI, P48, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-20671-0_5
[4]  
Agormedah EK., 2020, J EDUC TECHNOL ONLIN, V3, P183, DOI [10.3126/kumj.v18i2.32943, DOI 10.31681/JETOL.726441, 10.31681/jetol.726441]
[5]  
Aji W.K., 2020, IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching Learning, Linguistics Literature, V8, P632, DOI [10.24256/ideas.v8i2.1696, DOI 10.24256/IDEAS.V8I2.1696]
[6]  
Al-Busaidi KA, 2012, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V30
[7]   An empirical examination of continuous intention to use m-learning: An integrated model [J].
Al-Emran, Mostafa ;
Arpaci, Ibrahim ;
Salloum, Said A. .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 25 (04) :2899-2918
[8]  
Al-Gahtani S.S., 2016, Applied Computing and Informatics, V12, P27, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2014.09.001, DOI 10.1016/J.ACI.2014.09.001]
[9]   Online discussion in blended courses at Saudi Universities [J].
Alebaikan, Reem ;
Troudi, Salah .
INNOVATION AND CREATIVITY IN EDUCATION, 2010, 2 (02) :507-514
[10]   The efficiency of the "Learning Management System (LMS)" in AOU, Kuwait, as a communication tool in an E-learning system [J].
Alfadly, Ahmad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 27 (02) :157-169