The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

被引:1686
作者
von Elm, Erik
Altman, Douglas G.
Egger, Matthias
Pocock, Stuart J.
Gotzsche, Peter C.
Vandenbroucke, Jan P.
机构
[1] Univ Bern, ISPM, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Oxford, Ctr Stat Med, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ London, London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[5] Nord Cochrane Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Leiden Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
epidemiology; observational studies; quality of reporting; reporting guidelines;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.08.012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the websites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies. (c) 2007 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd./Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 251
页数:5
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Am J Epidemiol, V114, P609
[2]   What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers [J].
Bartlett, C ;
Sterne, J ;
Egger, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7355) :81-84
[3]  
Black N, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1215
[4]   Clinical epidemiological quality in molecular genetic research - The need for methodological standards [J].
Bogardus, ST ;
Concato, J ;
Feinstein, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (20) :1919-1926
[5]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[6]   CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Elbourne, DR ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7441) :702-708
[7]  
Egger M, 1998, BRIT MED J, V316, P140
[8]   Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials [J].
Egger, M ;
Jüni, P ;
Bartlett, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (15) :1996-1999
[9]   Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: An elaborated CONSORT statement [J].
Gagnier, JJ ;
Boon, H ;
Rochon, P ;
Moher, D ;
Barnes, J ;
Bombardier, C .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 144 (05) :364-367
[10]   Assessing the quality of research [J].
Glasziou, P ;
Vandenbroucke, J ;
Chalmers, I .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7430) :39-41