Coordinating Complex Work: Knowledge Networks, Partner Departures, and Client Relationship Performance in a Law Firm

被引:49
作者
Briscoe, Forrest [1 ]
Rogan, Michelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Business, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] INSEAD, F-77305 Fontainebleau, France
关键词
networks; brokerage; complexity; coordination; knowledge heterogeneity; knowledge experts; status; cohesion; team design; professional service firms; law firms; PROFESSIONAL SERVICE FIRMS; EMPLOYEE MOBILITY; SOCIAL-STRUCTURE; TEAMS; TOO; DIFFERENTIATION; ORGANIZATION; CAPABILITIES; INTEGRATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.2015.2231
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The mobility of individual managers has long presented a problem for firms in knowledge-intensive industries. Shifting to more complex work often reduces the importance of a single individual's knowledge for the firm's exchange relationships because complex work requires inputs from a broader set of the firm's members. Although complex work decreases the likelihood that a single individual can shift the exchange relationship to another firm, we propose that it increases the vulnerability of the firm's performance to departures of those individual managers who act as coordinators of knowledge. This leads us to focus on how the internal knowledge network formed to maintain each relationship can compound or mitigate the loss of a coordinating manager. Using original data on client relationships from a law firm, we examine the effect of internal knowledge networks and lead partner departures on the performance of the relationships. Supporting our argument, we find that the negative performance effect of a lead partner departure is greater when the network has high knowledge heterogeneity and involves more experts and lower when the network has high cohesion.
引用
收藏
页码:2392 / 2411
页数:20
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]   Understanding the relationship between founder-CEOs and firm performance [J].
Adams, Renee ;
Almeida, Heitor ;
Ferreira, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2009, 16 (01) :136-150
[2]  
Agresti Alan., 1978, Sociological Methodology, V9, P204, DOI [10.2307/270810, DOI 10.2307/270810]
[3]   THE ROUTINE MAY BE STABLE BUT THE ADVANTAGE IS NOT: COMPETITIVE IMPLICATIONS OF KEY EMPLOYEE MOBILITY [J].
Aime, Federico ;
Johnson, Scott ;
Ridge, Jason W. ;
Hill, Aaron D. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (01) :75-87
[4]   Complex systems - A new paradigm for the integrative study of management, physical, and technological systems [J].
Amaral, Luis A. Nunes ;
Uzzi, Brian .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (07) :1033-1035
[5]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2005, STRATEG MANAG
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1967, CLASSICS ORG MANAGEM
[8]   Hazards of the market: The continuity and dissolution of interorganizational market relationships [J].
Baker, WE ;
Faulkner, RR ;
Fisher, GA .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1998, 63 (02) :147-177
[9]   MARKET NETWORKS AND CORPORATE-BEHAVIOR [J].
BAKER, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1990, 96 (03) :589-625
[10]  
Balkundi P, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P49, DOI [10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785500, 10.2307/20159745]