Progress and challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models

被引:119
作者
Misura, KMS [1 ]
Baker, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biochem, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
protein structure prediction; model refinement; Rosetta; free energy function;
D O I
10.1002/prot.20376
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Achieving atomic level accuracy in de novo structure prediction presents a formidable challenge even in the context of protein models with correct topologies. High-resolution refinement is a fundamental test of force field accuracy and sampling methodology, and its limited success in both comparative modeling and de novo prediction contexts highlights the limitations of current approaches. We constructed four tests to identify bottlenecks in our current approach and to guide progress in this challenging area. The first three tests showed that idealized native structures are stable under our refinement simulation conditions and that the refinement protocol can significantly decrease the root mean square deviation (RMSD) of perturbed native structures. In the fourth test we applied the refinement protocol to de novo models and showed that accurate models could be identified based on their energies, and in several cases many of the buried side chains adopted native-like conformations. We also showed that the differences in backbone and side-chain conformations between the refined de novo models and the native structures are largely localized to loop regions and regions where the native structure has unusual features such as rare rotamers or atypical hydrogen bonding between beta-strands. The refined de novo models typically have higher energies than refined idealized native structures, indicating that sampling of local backbone conformations and side-chain packing arrangements in a condensed state is a primary obstacle. (C) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 29
页数:15
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Rosetta predictions in CASP5: Successes, failures, and prospects for complete automation [J].
Bradley, P ;
Chivian, D ;
Meiler, J ;
Misura, KMS ;
Rohl, CA ;
Schief, WR ;
Wedemeyer, WJ ;
Schueler-Furman, O ;
Murphy, P ;
Schonbrun, J ;
Strauss, CEM ;
Baker, D .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 :457-468
[2]   Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences [J].
Dunbrack, RL ;
Cohen, FE .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1997, 6 (08) :1661-1681
[3]   Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques [J].
Fan, H ;
Mark, AE .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (01) :211-220
[4]   Prediction of protein structure by emphasizing local side-chain/backbone interactions in ensembles of turn fragments [J].
Fang, QJ ;
Shortle, D .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS, 2003, 53 (06) :486-490
[5]   Assembling novel protein folds from super-secondary structural fragments [J].
Jones, DT ;
McGuffin, LJ .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 53 :480-485
[6]   An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes [J].
Kortemme, T ;
Morozov, AV ;
Baker, D .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2003, 326 (04) :1239-1259
[7]   Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy [J].
Kuhlman, B ;
Dantas, G ;
Ireton, GC ;
Varani, G ;
Stoddard, BL ;
Baker, D .
SCIENCE, 2003, 302 (5649) :1364-1368
[8]  
KUHLMAN B, 2000, P NATL ACAD SCI US, V97
[9]   Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction [J].
Lee, MR ;
Tsai, J ;
Baker, D ;
Kollman, PA .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2001, 313 (02) :417-430
[10]   2.1 and 1.8 Å average Cα RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and S15 [J].
Lee, MR ;
Baker, D ;
Kollman, PA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 123 (06) :1040-1046