Is differential treatment in response to service failures effective? The roles of comparison, loyalty, and scarcity messages

被引:9
作者
Kim, Heewon [1 ]
Jang, SooCheong [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Hospitality & Tourism Management, Marriott Hall,900 W State St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
Service failure and recovery; Differential treatment; Social comparison; Loyalty; Scarcity messages; PREFERENTIAL TREATMENT; FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS; CONSUMERS REACTIONS; LIMITED EDITION; LOSS AVERSION; SELF; RECOVERY; IMPACT; EXPERIENCES; UNIQUENESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102952
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown how a strong relationship between a customer and a firm can exacerbate dissatisfaction after a service failure. However, the effectiveness of providing preferential benefits to loyal customers during a service recovery has been less explored. The purpose of this paper was to examine the impact of differential treatment on post-recovery responses by customers' loyalty status as well as the moderating role of scarcity cues. By using a between subjects factorial design, the results revealed that less loyal customers' postrecovery evaluations could be less positive when they were given less compensation than loyal customers. Moreover, scarcity cues were not sufficient to alleviate less loyal customers' negative feelings in this circumstance. Hospitality practitioners may want to treat customers equally during service failures and use scarcity cues to mitigate loyal customers' feelings. Future studies may find it fruitful to research individual differences in such effects.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF INEQUITY [J].
ADAMS, JS .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1963, 67 (05) :422-&
[2]   SCARCITY MESSAGES A Consumer Competition Perspective [J].
Aggarwal, Praveen ;
Jun, Sung Youl ;
Huh, Jong Ho .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2011, 40 (03) :19-30
[3]   The Effect of Consumer Persuasion Knowledge on Scarcity Appeal Persuasiveness [J].
Aguirre-Rodriguez, Alexandra .
JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2013, 42 (04) :371-379
[4]  
Alicke MD, 2005, SELF SOCIAL JUDGMENT, V1, P85, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203943250-11
[5]   Does Exclusivity Always Pay Off? Exclusive Price Promotions and Consumer Response [J].
Barone, Michael J. ;
Roy, Tirthankar .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2010, 74 (02) :121-132
[6]   EXCHANGE AND POWER IN SOCIAL-LIFE - BLAU,PM [J].
BIERSTEDT, R .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1965, 30 (05) :789-790
[7]   THE SERVICE ENCOUNTER - DIAGNOSING FAVORABLE AND UNFAVORABLE INCIDENTS [J].
BITNER, MJ ;
BOOMS, BH ;
TETREAULT, MS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (01) :71-84
[8]   The effects of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice on postcomplaint behavior [J].
Blodgett, JG ;
Hill, DJ ;
Tax, SS .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1997, 73 (02) :185-210
[9]   Strategies to offset performance failures: The role of brand equity [J].
Brady, Michael K. ;
Cronin, J. Joseph, Jr. ;
Fox, Gavin L. ;
Roehm, Michelle L. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2008, 84 (02) :151-164
[10]  
Brehm S.S., 2013, PSYCHOL REACTANCE TH, DOI DOI 10.1037/000134