Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses

被引:16
作者
Bivia-Roig, Gemma [1 ]
Francisco Lison, Juan [2 ]
Sanchez-Zuriaga, Daniel [3 ]
机构
[1] CEU Univ, Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Calle Ramon y Cajal S-N, Valencia 46115, Spain
[2] CEU Univ, Univ Cardenal Herrera CEU, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Med, Calle Ramon y Cajal S-N, Valencia 46115, Spain
[3] Univ Valencia, Fac Med & Odontol, Dept Anat & Human Embryol, Av Blasco Ibanez 15, Valencia 46010, Spain
关键词
Electromyography; Erector spinae; Flexion relaxation phenomenon; Lumbar region; Pregnancy; Low back pain; LOW-BACK-PAIN; FLEXION-RELAXATION PHENOMENON; PELVIC GIRDLE PAIN; ERECTORES SPINAE; RELAXIN; BEHAVIOR; COLLAGEN; CREEP; QUANTIFICATION; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2018.08.009
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The kinematics of the lumbar region and the activation patterns of the erector spinae muscle have been associated with the genesis of low back pain, which is one of the most common complications associated with pregnancy. Despite the high prevalence of pregnancy-related low back pain, the biomechanical adaptations of the lumbar region during pregnancy remain unknown. PURPOSE: This study analyzes lumbar spine motion and the activation pattern of the lumbar erector spinae muscle in healthy pregnant women. STUDY DESIGN: A case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study involved 34 nulliparous women (control group) and 34 pregnant women in the third trimester (week 36 +/- 1). OUTCOME MEASURES: We recorded the parameters of angular displacement of the lumbar spine in the sagittal plane during trunk flexion-extension, and the EMG activity of the erector spinae muscles during flexion, extension, eccentric and concentric contractions, and the myolectrical silence. METHODS: The participants performed several series of trunk flexion-extension movements, which were repeated 2 months postpartum. The position of the lumbar spine was recorded using an electromagnetic motion capture system. EMG activity was recorded by a surface EMG system and expressed as a percentage of a submaximal reference contraction. RESULTS: Antepartum measurements showed a decrease (relative to control and postpartum measurements) in lumbar maximum flexion (52.5 +/- 10.5 degrees vs 57.3 +/- 7.7 degrees and 58.7 +/- 8.6 degrees; p < .01), the percentage of lumbar flexion during forward bending (56.4 +/- 5.6% vs 59.4 +/- 6.8% and 59.7 +/- 5.6%; p < .01), and the time keeping maximum levels of lumbar flexion (35.7 +/- 6.7% vs 43.8 +/- 5.3% and 50.1 +/- 3.7%; p < .01). Higher levels of erector spinae activation were observed in pregnant women during forward bending (10.1 +/- 4.8% vs 6.3 +/- 2.4% and 6.6 +/- 2.7%; p < .01) and eccentric contraction (12.1 +/- 5.2% vs 9.4 +/- 3.1% and 9.1 +/- 2.9%; p < .01), as well as a shortened erector spinae myoelectric silence during flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women show adaptations in their patterns of lumbar motion and erector spinae activity during trunk flexion-extension. These changes could be associated with the genesis of pregnancy-related low back pain, by means of biomechanical protection mechanisms against the increase on abdominal mass and ligamentous laxity. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   DIURNAL CHANGES IN SPINAL MECHANICS AND THEIR CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
DOLAN, P ;
HUTTON, WC ;
PORTER, RW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1990, 72 (02) :266-270
[2]   A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain [J].
Bastiaanssen, JM ;
de Bie, RA ;
Bastiaenen, CHG ;
Essed, GGM ;
van den Brandt, PA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2005, 120 (01) :3-14
[3]   Spinal posture and pelvic position during pregnancy: a prospective rasterstereographic pilot study [J].
Betsch, Marcel ;
Wehrle, Regina ;
Dor, Larissa ;
Rapp, Walter ;
Jungbluth, Pascal ;
Hakimi, Mohssen ;
Wild, Michael .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (06) :1282-1288
[4]   PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (02) :106-119
[5]   Changes in trunk posture and muscle responses in standing during pregnancy and postpartum [J].
Bivia-Roig, Gemma ;
Francisco Lison, Juan ;
Sanchez-Zuriaga, Daniel .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (03)
[6]   Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy [J].
Borg-Stein, J ;
Dugan, SA ;
Gruber, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 84 (03) :180-192
[7]   The biomechanical and clinical significance of the lumbar erector spinae flexion-relaxation phenomenon: A review of literature [J].
Colloca, CJ ;
Hinrichs, RN .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (08) :623-631
[8]   Reliability of EMG measurements for trunk muscles during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions in healthy controls and CLBP patients [J].
Dankaerts, W ;
O'Sullivan, PB ;
Burnett, AF ;
Straker, LM ;
Danneels, LA .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2004, 14 (03) :333-342
[9]   INFLUENCE OF LUMBAR AND HIP MOBILITY ON THE BENDING STRESSES ACTING ON THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
DOLAN, P ;
ADAMS, MA .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1993, 8 (04) :185-192
[10]  
Dumas G, 1998, 3 N AM C BIOM WAT ON