Healthy and Sustainable Food Shopping: A Survey of Intentions and Motivations

被引:9
作者
Blanke, Julia [1 ,2 ]
Billieux, Joel [3 ]
Voegele, Claus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Behav & Cognit Sci, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] Munster Technol Univ, People Behav & Technol Integrat Res Grp, Cork, Ireland
[3] Univ Lausanne, Inst Psychol, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
health; sustainability; grocery shopping; behavioral intention; motivation; theory of planned behavior; self-determination theory; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; DIETARY GUIDELINES; SHIFT;
D O I
10.3389/fnut.2022.742614
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo determine the relationship between sustainable and healthy food shopping behavior comparing general motivation with the immediate intention to act. MethodWe conducted an online survey of 144 staff at the Cork Institute of Technology, Ireland, using a questionnaire based on the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Self-Determination Theory to compute the Behavioral Intention score and the Relative Autonomy Index in relation to healthy and sustainable grocery shopping. ResultsThe intention to shop healthy food was higher (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.56) than the intention to shop in a sustainable way. A significant intention-action gap was observed for both healthy (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.97) and sustainable grocery shopping (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.78). While there was a significant correlation (p < 0.001) between the longer-term motivations to act in a healthy and sustainable way, this association was not significant (p = 0.16) for the more short-term Behavioral Intention scores. Conclusion and ImplicationsHealth was identified as a more important driver for dietary behavior compared to sustainability. While longer-term motivation shows a stronger correlation between healthy and sustainable grocery shopping, short-term intentions do not follow this pattern as strongly. A significant intention-action gap exists for both, which is stronger for sustainability than for health.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 2015, Rivista di Economia Agraria, V70, P121
[2]  
Ajzen I., 2006, BEHAV INTERVENT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Working paper
[4]  
Bailey R., 2015, ROYAL I INT AFFAIRS
[5]   Perspective: Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe-Scientific Concepts, Current Status, and Perspectives [J].
Bechthold, Angela ;
Boeing, Heiner ;
Tetens, Inge ;
Schwingshackl, Lukas ;
Noethlings, Ute .
ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2018, 9 (05) :544-560
[6]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[7]   Understanding, promoting and predicting sustainable diets: A systematic review [J].
Biasini, Beatrice ;
Rosi, Alice ;
Giopp, Francesca ;
Turgut, Rana ;
Scazzina, Francesca ;
Menozzi, Davide .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 111 :191-207
[8]   Making Sense of Sustainability: A Practice Theories Approach to Buying Food [J].
Brons, Anke ;
Oosterveer, Peter .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03)
[9]   Modelling the health co-benefits of sustainable diets in the UK, France, Finland, Italy and Sweden [J].
Cobiac, Linda J. ;
Scarborough, Peter .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2019, 73 (04) :624-633
[10]   EU quality label vs organic food products: A multigroup structural equation modeling to assess consumers' intention to buy in light of sustainable motives [J].
De Canio, Francesca ;
Martinelli, Elisa .
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 139