Determinants of tracheostomy decannulation: an international survey

被引:110
作者
Stelfox, Henry Thomas [1 ]
Crimi, Claudia [2 ]
Berra, Lorenzo [2 ]
Noto, Alberto [3 ]
Schmidt, Ulrich [2 ]
Bigatello, Luca M. [2 ]
Hess, Dean [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Foothills Med Ctr, Dept Crit Care Med, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Univ Messina, Policlin Univ G Martino, Dept Anesthesia & Crit Care, Messina, Italy
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2008年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/cc6802
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Although tracheostomy is probably the most common surgical procedure performed on critically ill patients, it is unknown when a tracheostomy tube can be safely removed. Methods We performed a cross- sectional survey of physicians and respiratory therapists with expertise in the management of tracheostomized patients at 118 medical centers to characterize contemporary opinions about tracheostomy decannulation practice and to define factors that influence these practices. Results We surveyed 309 clinicians, of whom 225 responded ( 73%). Clinicians rated patient level of consciousness, ability to tolerate tracheostomy tube capping, cough effectiveness, and secretions as the most important factors in the decision to decannulate a patient. Decannulation failure was defined as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 hours ( 45% of respondents) to 96 hours ( 20% of respondents) of tracheostomy removal, and 2% to 5% was the most frequent recommendation for an acceptable recannulation rate ( 44% of respondents). In clinical scenarios, clinicians who worked in chronic care facilities ( 30%) were less likely to recommend decannulation than clinicians who worked in weaning ( 47%), rehabilitation ( 53%), or acute care ( 55%) facilities ( p = 0.015). Patients were most likely to be recommended for decannulation if they were alert and interactive ( odds ratio [ OR] 4.76, 95% confidence interval [ CI] 3.27 to 6.90; p < 0.001), had a strong cough ( OR 3.84, 95% CI 2.66 to 5.54; p < 0.001), had scant thin secretions ( OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.56 to 3.19; p < 0.001), and required minimal supplemental oxygen ( OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.45 to 2.86; p < 0.001). Conclusion Patient level of consciousness, cough effectiveness, secretions, and oxygenation are important determinants of clinicians' tracheostomy decannulation opinions. Most surveyed clinicians defined decannulation failure as the need to reinsert an artificial airway within 48 to 96 hours of planned tracheostomy removal.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
*AM COQOHCI, 2001, CROSS QUAL CHASM NEW
[2]  
Apezteguia C, 2004, UPD INT CAR, V41, P121
[3]   Criteria for extubation and tracheostomy tube removal for patients with ventilatory failure - A different approach to weaning [J].
Bach, JR ;
Saporito, LR .
CHEST, 1996, 110 (06) :1566-1571
[4]   Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome [J].
Ceriana, P ;
Carlucci, A ;
Navalesi, P ;
Rampulla, C ;
Delmastro, M ;
Piaggi, G ;
De Mattia, E ;
Nava, S .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (05) :845-848
[5]  
Christopher Kent L, 2005, Respir Care, V50, P538
[6]   DETERMINANTS IN CANADIAN HEALTH-CARE WORKERS OF THE DECISION TO WITHDRAW LIFE-SUPPORT FROM THE CRITICALLY ILL [J].
COOK, DJ ;
GUYATT, GH ;
JAESCHKE, R ;
REEVE, J ;
SPANIER, A ;
KING, D ;
MOLLOY, DW ;
WILLAN, A ;
STREINER, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (09) :703-708
[7]   Increase in tracheostomy for prolonged mechanical ventilation in North Carolina, 1993-2002 [J].
Cox, CE ;
Carson, SS ;
Holmes, GM ;
Howard, A ;
Carey, TS .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 32 (11) :2219-2226
[8]   Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: A meta-analysis [J].
Dulguerov, P ;
Gysin, C ;
Perneger, TV ;
Chevrolet, JC .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (08) :1617-1625
[9]   Hospital and long-term outcome after tracheostomy for respiratory failure [J].
Engoren, M ;
Arslanian-Engoren, C ;
Fenn-Buderer, N .
CHEST, 2004, 125 (01) :220-227
[10]  
Epstein Scott K, 2005, Respir Care, V50, P542