Comparison of different statistical methods used to estimate Weibull parameters for wind speed contribution in nearby an offshore site, Republic of Korea

被引:46
作者
Kang, Sangkyun [1 ]
Khanjari, Ali [1 ]
You, Sungho [2 ]
Lee, Jang-Ho [3 ]
机构
[1] Kunsan Natl Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Grad Sch, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
[2] Kunsan Natl Univ, Inst Offshore Wind Energy, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
[3] Kunsan Natl Univ, Sch Mech Syst Engn, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Wind speed; Weibull distribution; Weibull parameter; Estimation methods; Statistical analysis; NUMERICAL-METHODS; POWER-DENSITY; ENERGY; REGION; GENERATORS; MODELS; COAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.078
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Weibull probability distribution indicates the probability of a specific wind speed and must be calculated before wind turbine installation. The Weibull distribution is affected by shape and scale parameters, which are driven in various ways. Many studies have conducted research to determine a more reliable method among various Weibull parameter estimation methods. However, since these studies showed different results, studies on determining the higher reliable Weibull parameter estimation methods continues. In this study, we analyzed 10 years of data collected at the same location and height level in Maldo island(from 2010 to 2019) and Saemangeum seawall (from 2011 to 2012), the Republic of Korea. While former studies tried to rank the Weibull distribution methods based on the statistical analyses, in this study, we compared the Weibull parameters using twelve methods and identified the highest reliable and efficient methods for deriving the Weibull probability distribution by using the new approach comparing the variance of RMSE, R-2 , and chi(2) , which give a comprehensive insight about the level and fluctuations errors. These twelve methods are Alternative maximum likelihood method, Equivalent energy method, Empirical method of Justus, Empirical method of Lysen, Energy pattern factor method, Graphical method, Modified energy pattern factor method, Maximum likelihood method, Moment method, Modified maximum likelihood method, Power density method, Standard deviation method. The results showed while Empirical method of Justus, Empirical method of Lysen, Moment method, and Standard deviation method had the best accuracies in prediction of wind speed distribution, some methods such as Graphical method, Alternative maximum likelihood method, Equivalent energy method, and Energy pattern factor method had the worst prediction of wind speed distribution based on all variance of statistical methods for both regions. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7358 / 7373
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   Comparative Study of Different Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters: A Case Study on Jeju Island, South Korea [J].
Kang, Dongbum ;
Ko, Kyungnam ;
Huh, Jongchul .
ENERGIES, 2018, 11 (02)
[32]   Analysis and efficient comparison of ten numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy potential: Application to the city of Bafoussam, Cameroon [J].
Kapen, Pascalin Tiam ;
Gouajio, Marinette Jeutho ;
Yemele, David .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2020, 159 :1188-1198
[33]   Evaluation of wind power production prospective and Weibull parameter estimation methods for Babaurband, Sindh Pakistan [J].
Khahro, Shahnawaz Farhan ;
Tabbassum, Kavita ;
Soomro, Amir Mahmood ;
Dong, Lei ;
Liao, Xiaozhong .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 :956-967
[34]  
Kidmo D.K., 2015, Revue des Energies Renouvelables, V18, P105
[35]   Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea [J].
Kim, Choong-Ki ;
Jang, Seonju ;
Kim, Tae Yun .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 120 :151-162
[36]  
Korea Meteorological Administration, 2016, SURFACE WEATHER OBSE
[37]  
Kumar KSP, 2015, Renew: Wind, Water, Solar, V2, P14, DOI [10.1186/s40807-015-0014-0, DOI 10.1186/S40807-015-0014-0]
[38]   Wind characteristic analysis based on Weibull distribution of Al-Salman site, Iraq [J].
Mahmood, Faleh H. ;
Resen, Ali K. ;
Khamees, Ahmed B. .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2020, 6 :79-87
[39]   Assessing different parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to compute wind power density [J].
Mohammadi, Kasra ;
Alavi, Omid ;
Mostafaeipour, Ali ;
Goudarzi, Navid ;
Jalilvand, Mandi .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 108 :322-335
[40]   Evaluation of suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: a case study from Tamil Nadu, India [J].
Natarajan, Narayanan ;
Vasudevan, Mangottiri ;
Rehman, Shafiqur .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (57) :85855-85868