Comparison of different statistical methods used to estimate Weibull parameters for wind speed contribution in nearby an offshore site, Republic of Korea

被引:46
作者
Kang, Sangkyun [1 ]
Khanjari, Ali [1 ]
You, Sungho [2 ]
Lee, Jang-Ho [3 ]
机构
[1] Kunsan Natl Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Grad Sch, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
[2] Kunsan Natl Univ, Inst Offshore Wind Energy, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
[3] Kunsan Natl Univ, Sch Mech Syst Engn, Gunsan Si 54150, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Wind speed; Weibull distribution; Weibull parameter; Estimation methods; Statistical analysis; NUMERICAL-METHODS; POWER-DENSITY; ENERGY; REGION; GENERATORS; MODELS; COAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.10.078
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The Weibull probability distribution indicates the probability of a specific wind speed and must be calculated before wind turbine installation. The Weibull distribution is affected by shape and scale parameters, which are driven in various ways. Many studies have conducted research to determine a more reliable method among various Weibull parameter estimation methods. However, since these studies showed different results, studies on determining the higher reliable Weibull parameter estimation methods continues. In this study, we analyzed 10 years of data collected at the same location and height level in Maldo island(from 2010 to 2019) and Saemangeum seawall (from 2011 to 2012), the Republic of Korea. While former studies tried to rank the Weibull distribution methods based on the statistical analyses, in this study, we compared the Weibull parameters using twelve methods and identified the highest reliable and efficient methods for deriving the Weibull probability distribution by using the new approach comparing the variance of RMSE, R-2 , and chi(2) , which give a comprehensive insight about the level and fluctuations errors. These twelve methods are Alternative maximum likelihood method, Equivalent energy method, Empirical method of Justus, Empirical method of Lysen, Energy pattern factor method, Graphical method, Modified energy pattern factor method, Maximum likelihood method, Moment method, Modified maximum likelihood method, Power density method, Standard deviation method. The results showed while Empirical method of Justus, Empirical method of Lysen, Moment method, and Standard deviation method had the best accuracies in prediction of wind speed distribution, some methods such as Graphical method, Alternative maximum likelihood method, Equivalent energy method, and Energy pattern factor method had the worst prediction of wind speed distribution based on all variance of statistical methods for both regions. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:7358 / 7373
页数:16
相关论文
共 51 条
[21]   Performance analysis of numerical methods for determining Weibull distribution parameters applied to wind speed in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil [J].
Guarienti, Jose Antonio ;
Almeida, Aleska Kaufmann ;
Neto, Armando Menegati ;
de Oliveira Ferreira, Ayrton Renan ;
Ottonelli, Joao Paulo ;
de Almeida, Isabel Kaufmann .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2020, 42
[22]   New methods to assess wind resources in terms of wind speed, load, power and direction [J].
Gugliani, G. K. ;
Sarkar, A. ;
Ley, C. ;
Mandal, S. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 129 :168-182
[23]  
Hove T, 2014, J ENERGY SOUTH AFR, V25, P37
[24]   Techno - Economic assessment of wind power potential of Hawke's Bay using Weibull parameter: A review [J].
Hulio, Zahid Hussain ;
Jiang, Wei ;
Rehman, S. .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2019, 26
[25]   Estimation of monthly wind speed distribution basing on hybrid Weibull distribution [J].
Ihaddadene, Razika ;
Ihaddadene, Nabila ;
Mostefaoui, Marouane .
WORLD JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (06) :509-515
[26]  
Indhumathy D., 2014, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, V3, P8340
[27]  
Jamil M., 1994, Wind Engineering, V18, P227
[28]   Wind power analysis and site matching of wind turbine generators in Kingdom of Bahrain [J].
Jowder, Fawzi A. L. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2009, 86 (04) :538-545
[29]  
JUSTUS CG, 1978, J APPL METEOROL, V17, P350, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<0350:MFEWSF>2.0.CO
[30]  
2