Sexual selection and speciation

被引:558
作者
Ritchie, Michael G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Andrews, Sch Biol, St Andrews KY16 9TS, Fife, Scotland
关键词
reproductive isolation; sexual conflict; comparative method; experimental evolution; genomics; SYMPATRIC SPECIATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; HYBRID STERILITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; RAPID EVOLUTION; BODY-SIZE; EXPERIMENTAL MANIPULATION; ANTAGONISTIC COEVOLUTION; INCIPIENT SPECIATION; GENETIC REVOLUTIONS;
D O I
10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095733
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sexual selection has a reputation as a major cause of speciation, one of the most potent forces driving reproductive isolation. This reputation arises from observations that species differ most in traits involved with mating success and from successful models of sexual selection-driven speciation. But how well proven is the case? Models confirm that the process can occur, but is strongest in conjunction with ecological or niche specialization. Some models also show that strong sexual selection can act against speciation. Studies using the comparative method are equivocal and often inconclusive, but some phylogeographic studies are more convincing. Experimental evolution and genetic or genomic analyses are in their infancy, but look particularly promising for resolving the importance of sexual selection. The case for sexual selection is not as strongly supported as, for example, allopatric speciation. Sexual selection probably contributes most effectively alongside ecological selection or selection for species recognition than as a solitary process.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 102
页数:24
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]   Directional selection has shaped the oral jaws of Lake Malawi cichlid fishes [J].
Albertson, RC ;
Streelman, JT ;
Kocher, TD .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (09) :5252-5257
[2]   Sympatric speciation by sexual selection alone is unlikely [J].
Arnegard, ME ;
Kondrashov, AS .
EVOLUTION, 2004, 58 (02) :222-237
[3]   Sexual conflict promotes speciation in insects [J].
Arnqvist, G ;
Edvardsson, M ;
Friberg, U ;
Nilsson, T .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (19) :10460-10464
[4]   Antagonistic coevolution between the sexes in a group of insects [J].
Arnqvist, G ;
Rowe, L .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6873) :787-789
[5]   Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection [J].
Arnqvist, G .
NATURE, 1998, 393 (6687) :784-786
[6]   SEXUAL SELECTION AND TAXONOMIC DIVERSITY IN PASSERINE BIRDS [J].
BARRACLOUGH, TG ;
HARVEY, PH ;
NEE, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1995, 259 (1355) :211-215
[7]   The genetic architecture of male colour differences between a sympatric Lake Malawi cichlid species pair [J].
Barson, N. J. ;
Knight, M. E. ;
Turner, G. F. .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01) :45-53
[8]   GENETIC REVOLUTIONS, FOUNDER EFFECTS, AND SPECIATION [J].
BARTON, NH ;
CHARLESWORTH, B .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1984, 15 :133-164
[9]   Sexual selection and speciation in Hawaiian Drosophila [J].
Boake, CRB .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2005, 35 (03) :297-303
[10]   Sexual selection drives speciation in an Amazonian frog [J].
Boul, Kathryn E. ;
Funk, W. Chris ;
Darst, Catherine R. ;
Cannatella, David C. ;
Ryan, Michael J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 274 (1608) :399-406