Fusion probability in heavy nuclei

被引:33
作者
Banerjee, Tathagata [1 ]
Nath, S. [1 ]
Pal, Santanu [2 ]
机构
[1] Inter Univ Accelerator Ctr, Nucl Phys Grp, New Delhi 110067, India
[2] Ctr Variable Energy Cyclotron, Phys Grp, Kolkata 700064, India
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW C | 2015年 / 91卷 / 03期
关键词
CROSS-SECTIONS; QUASI-FISSION; EXCITATION-FUNCTIONS; SUBBARRIER FUSION; STATISTICAL-MODEL; SPIN DISTRIBUTION; MASSIVE NUCLEI; DEPENDENCE; COMPETITION; HINDRANCE;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.91.034619
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Background: Fusion between two massive nuclei is a very complex process and is characterized by three stages: (a) capture inside the potential barrier, (b) formation of an equilibrated compound nucleus (CN), and (c) statistical decay of the CN leading to a cold evaporation residue (ER) or fission. The second stage is the least understood of the three and is the most crucial in predicting yield of superheavy elements (SHE) formed in complete fusion reactions. Purpose: A systematic study of average fusion probability, < P-CN >, is undertaken to obtain a better understanding of its dependence on various reaction parameters. The study may also help to clearly demarcate onset of non-CN fission (NCNF), which causes fusion probability, P-CN, to deviate from unity. Method: ER excitation functions for 52 reactions leading to CN in the mass region 170-220, which are available in the literature, have been compared with statistical model (SM) calculations. Capture cross sections have been obtained from a coupled-channels code. In the SM, shell corrections in both the level density and the fission barrier have been included. < P-CN > for these reactions has been extracted by comparing experimental and theoretical ER excitation functions in the energy range similar to 5%-35% above the potential barrier, where known effects of nuclear structure are insignificant. Results: < P-CN > has been shown to vary with entrance channel mass asymmetry, eta (or charge product, Z(p)Z(t)), as well as with fissility of the CN, chi(CN). No parameter has been found to be adequate as a single scaling variable to determine < P-CN >. Approximate boundaries have been obtained from where < P-CN > starts deviating from unity. Conclusions: This study quite clearly reveals the limits of applicability of the SM in interpreting experimental observables from fusion reactions involving two massive nuclei. Deviation of < P-CN > from unity marks the beginning of the domain of dynamical models of fusion. Availability of precise ER cross sections over a wider energy range for many more reactions is desired for accurate determination of < P-CN > and more insight into the dynamics of fusion in the heavy mass region.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]   Treatment of competition between complete fusion and quasifission in collisions of heavy nuclei [J].
Adamian, GG ;
Antonenko, NV ;
Scheid, W ;
Volkov, VV .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1997, 627 (02) :361-378
[2]   Isotopic dependence of fusion cross sections in reactions with heavy nuclei [J].
Adamian, GG ;
Antonenko, NV ;
Scheid, W .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 2000, 678 (1-2) :24-38
[3]   Cross section systematics for the lightest Bi and Po nuclei produced in complete fusion reactions with heavy ions -: art. no. 014612 [J].
Andreyev, AN ;
Ackermann, D ;
Antalic, S ;
Darby, IG ;
Franchoo, S ;
Hessberger, FP ;
Hofmann, S ;
Huyse, M ;
Kuusiniemi, P ;
Lommel, B ;
Kindler, B ;
Mann, R ;
Münzenberg, G ;
Page, RD ;
Saro, S ;
Sulignano, B ;
Streicher, B ;
Van de Vel, K ;
Van Duppen, P ;
Wiseman, DR .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2005, 72 (01)
[4]  
ANDREYEV AN, 1995, NUCL PHYS A, V583, pC169
[5]   Decay widths of highly excited Ra compound nuclei [J].
Andreyev, AN ;
Bogdanov, DD ;
Chepigin, VI ;
Kabachenko, AP ;
Malyshev, ON ;
Muzichka, YA ;
Oganessian, YT ;
Popeko, AG ;
Pustylnik, BI ;
Sagaidak, RN ;
TerAkopian, GM ;
Yeremin, AV .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1997, 620 (02) :229-248
[6]   Statistical model and cross sections for the evaporation residues formed in the reaction 22Ne+190Os at the 22Ne projectile bombarding energy of 6.0-10.0 MeV/nucleon [J].
Andreyev, AN ;
Bogdanov, DD ;
Chepigin, VI ;
Kabachenko, AP ;
Malyshev, ON ;
Oganessian, YT ;
Popeko, AG ;
Rohac, J ;
Sagaidak, RN ;
Ter-Akopian, GM ;
Yeremin, AV ;
Saro, S ;
Veselsky, M .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1997, 626 (03) :857-870
[7]   COMPETITION BETWEEN COMPLETE FUSION AND QUASI-FISSION IN REACTIONS BETWEEN MASSIVE NUCLEI - THE FUSION BARRIER [J].
ANTONENKO, NV ;
CHEREPANOV, EA ;
NASIROV, AK ;
PERMJAKOV, VP ;
VOLKOV, VV .
PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1993, 319 (04) :425-430
[8]   COMPOUND NUCLEUS FORMATION IN REACTIONS BETWEEN MASSIVE NUCLEI - FUSION BARRIER [J].
ANTONENKO, NV ;
CHEREPANOV, EA ;
NASIROV, AK ;
PERMJAKOV, VP ;
VOLKOV, VV .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1995, 51 (05) :2635-2645
[9]   Dynamical approach to heavy-ion induced fission using actinide target nuclei at energies around the Coulomb barrier [J].
Aritomo, Y. ;
Hagino, K. ;
Nishio, K. ;
Chiba, S. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 2012, 85 (04)
[10]   Fluctuation-dissipation model for synthesis of superheavy elements [J].
Aritomo, Y ;
Wada, T ;
Ohta, M ;
Abe, Y .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1999, 59 (02) :796-809