A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis

被引:164
作者
Rice, Kenneth [1 ]
Higgins, Julian P. T. [2 ]
Lumley, Thomas [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Common effect; Fixed effect; Fixed effects; Meta-analysis; Meta-regression; Random effect; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; MANTEL-HAENSZEL ESTIMATOR; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT-LEVEL; RELATIVE EFFICIENCY; STATISTICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; REGRESSION; MODIFIERS; INFERENCE; VARIANCE;
D O I
10.1111/rssa.12275
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a common tool for synthesizing results of multiple studies. Among methods for performing meta-analysis, the approach known as fixed effects' or inverse variance weighting' is popular and widely used. A common interpretation of this method is that it assumes that the underlying effects in contributing studies are identical, and for this reason it is sometimes dismissed by practitioners. However, other interpretations of fixed effects analyses do not make this assumption, yet appear to be little known in the literature. We review these alternative interpretations, describing both their strengths and their limitations. We also describe how heterogeneity of the underlying effects can be addressed, with the same minimal assumptions, through either testing or meta-regression. Recommendations for the practice of meta-analysis are given; it is hoped that these will foster more direct connection of the questions that meta-analysts wish to answer with the statistical methods they choose.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 227
页数:23
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision-making [J].
Ades, A. E. ;
Welton, Nicky J. ;
Caldwell, Deborah ;
Price, Malcolm ;
Goubar, Aicha ;
Lu, Guobing .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2008, 13 :12-22
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPLEX SURVEYS A GU
[3]   Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice [J].
Anzures-Cabrera, Judith ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. .
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2010, 1 (01) :66-80
[4]   A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS [J].
BERKEY, CS ;
HOAGLIN, DC ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
COLDITZ, GA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) :395-411
[5]   Individual patient- versus group-level data meta-regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head [J].
Berlin, JA ;
Santanna, J ;
Schmid, CH ;
Szczech, LA ;
Feldman, HI .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (03) :371-387
[6]  
BERMAN M, 1988, BIOMETRIKA, V75, P779
[7]   Meta-analysis: Neither quick nor easy [J].
Berman N.G. ;
Parker R.A. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2 (1) :1-9
[8]  
Bernardo J.M., 2003, Bayesian Theory
[9]  
Borenstein M., 2009, INTRODUCTION TO META
[10]  
Brazzale A.R., 2005, R NEWS, V5, P20