Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

被引:34
作者
Beckmann, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gibbons, K. [3 ]
Flenady, V [3 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mater Hlth, Level 6 Duncombe Bldg,Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Queensland, Mater Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Balloon; cervical ripening; labour; induced; mechanical methods; outpatient; prostaglandin; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.16030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare clinical outcomes following induction of labour (IOL) using a balloon catheter and going home, versus prostaglandin (PG) as an inpatient. Design Randomised controlled trial. Setting Eight Australian maternity hospitals. Population Women with uncomplicated term singleton pregnancies undergoing IOL for low-risk indications including post-term, advanced maternal age and 'social' reasons. Methods Between September 2015 and October 2018, 347 women were randomised to a balloon outpatient group and 348 to a PG inpatient group. The PG group received Dinoprostone, either 2 mg gel or 10 mg controlled-release tape. The balloon group had a double-balloon catheter inserted and went home. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was a composite neonatal measure comprising nursery admission, intubation/cardiac compressions, acidaemia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy, seizure, infection, pulmonary hypertension, stillbirth or death. Clinical and process outcomes are reported. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcome comparing balloon with PG (18.6% versus 25.8%; relative risk = 0.77, 95% CI 0.51-1.02; P = 0.070), cord arterial pH <7.10 (3.5% versus 9.2%; P = 0.072), nursery admissions (12.6% versus 15.5%; P = 0.379), neonatal antibiotic use (12.1% versus 17.6%; P = 0.103), or mode of birth. Nulliparous women in the balloon group had lower rates of the primary outcome (20.4% versus 31.0%;P = 0.032); Parous women were less likely to have an unassisted vaginal birth (77.6% versus 92.3%; P = 0.045). Conclusions Balloon catheters may be a superior method of cervical priming for nulliparous women, whereas this may not be the case for parous women. It is feasible that nulliparous women go home after commencing balloon catheter IOL, and the likelihood of adverse outcomes is low. Tweetable abstract Multicentre trial shows outpatient induction using balloon catheter is safe and feasible for nulliparous women.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 579
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A cost analysis of inpatient compared with outpatient prostaglandin E2 cervical priming for induction of labour: results from the OPRA trial [J].
Adelson, Pamela L. ;
Wedlock, Garry R. ;
Wilkinson, Chris S. ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Bryce, Robert L. ;
Turnbull, Deborah A. .
AUSTRALIAN HEALTH REVIEW, 2013, 37 (04) :467-473
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Obstet Gynecol, V114, P386, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b48ef5
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.PUB3
[4]   Prostaglandin vaginal gel induction of labor comparing amniotomy with repeat prostaglandin gel [J].
Beckmann, Michael ;
Kumar, Sailesh ;
Flenady, Vicki ;
Harker, Ellen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (06) :859.e1-859.e9
[5]   Predictors of cesarean delivery in women undergoing labor induction with a Foley balloon [J].
Delaney, Shani ;
Shaffer, Brian L. ;
Cheng, Yvonne W. ;
Vargas, Juan ;
Sparks, Teresa N. ;
Paul, Kathleen ;
Caughey, Aaron B. .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (09) :1000-1004
[6]   Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review [J].
Diederen, M. ;
Gommers, J. S. M. ;
Wilkinson, C. ;
Turnbull, D. ;
Mol, B. W. J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 125 (09) :1086-1095
[7]  
Guidance NICE , 2012, NEON INF EARL ONS AN
[8]   Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial [J].
Henry, Amanda ;
Madan, Arushi ;
Reid, Rachel ;
Tracy, Sally K. ;
Austin, Kathryn ;
Welsh, Alec ;
Challis, Daniel .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2013, 13
[9]   Mechanical methods for induction of labour [J].
Jozwiak, Marta ;
Bloemenkamp, Kitty W. M. ;
Kelly, Anthony J. ;
Mol, Ben Willem J. ;
Irion, Olivier ;
Boulvain, Michel .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03)
[10]   Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes [J].
Kelly, Anthony J. ;
Alfirevic, Zarko ;
Ghosh, Arpita .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (11)