Alignment between biology curriculum standards and five textbook editions: a content analysis

被引:14
作者
Yu, Jian [1 ,3 ]
Li, Chen [2 ]
Li, Gaofeng [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Fac Educ, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Hebei Normal Univ, Coll Teacher Educ, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Shaanxi Normal Univ Branch, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Assessment Basic Educ Qual, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Alignment evaluation; textbook; content analysis; CHEMISTRY TEXTBOOKS; SCIENCE CURRICULUM; UNITED-STATES; TEACHERS USE; SCHOOL; MATHEMATICS; ASSESSMENTS; CHINA; TESTS;
D O I
10.1080/09500693.2022.2119621
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the alignment between curriculum standards and textbooks, based on a standards-based science education context. The analysis sample includes the High School Biology Curriculum Standards and five editions of biology textbooks in China. Porter's alignment model is used to construct a two-dimensional (content areas and cognitive levels) matrix of curriculum standards and textbooks to calculate alignment indices and marginal discrepancies between the two dimensions. The results show that 1) alignment between curriculum standards and textbooks has not been achieved; 2) textbooks are highly consistent and statistically significant, but independent of curriculum standards; 3) the distribution of curriculum standards and textbooks across various core concepts and cognitive levels is unbalanced; 4) both curriculum standards and textbooks overemphasise the cognitive levels of remembering and understanding, while minimally representing the applying, analysing, evaluating, and creating levels. This study examines the development of curriculum alignment in the context of current worldwide standards-based science education reforms and provides a framework for alignment research based on content analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:2241 / 2260
页数:20
相关论文
共 62 条
[51]   Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: What might we learn? [J].
Silver E.A. .
ZDM, 2009, 41 (6) :827-832
[52]  
Stein M.K., 2007, 2 HDB RES MATH TEACH, P319
[53]   THE ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THIRD-GRADE PRIMARY SCHOOL SCIENCE TEXTBOOKS AND CURRICULUM STANDARDS IN CHINA AND JAPAN [J].
Sun, Lihui ;
Li, Liangbo .
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2021, 20 (03) :507-518
[54]   What Role Might the Textbook Play in Integrating Reading into Mathematics Instruction? [J].
Thompson, Denisse R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2022, 20 (SUPPL 1) :141-162
[55]   Textbooks as a Possible Influence on Unscientific Ideas about Evolution [J].
Tshuma, Tholani ;
Sanders, Martie .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 49 (04) :354-369
[56]  
Valverde G.A., 2002, ACCORDING BOOK USING
[57]   Science education textbook research trends: a systematic literature review [J].
Vojir, Karel ;
Rusek, Martin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (11) :1496-1516
[58]  
Webb N. L., 1997, Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science Education Research Monograph, V6
[59]   A Comparative Analysis of Junior High School Science Curriculum Standards in Mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macao: Based on Revised Bloom's Taxonomy [J].
Wei, Bing ;
Ou, Yitong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2019, 17 (08) :1459-1474
[60]   Content analysis of inquiry-based tasks in high school biology textbooks in Mainland China [J].
Yang, Wenyuan ;
Liu, Cheng ;
Liu, Enshan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, 41 (06) :827-845