Averaged Dynamic Modeling and Control of a Quasi-Z-Source Inverter for Wind Power Applications

被引:11
作者
Soares-Ramos, Emanuel P. P. [1 ,2 ]
De Oliveira-Assis, Lais [2 ]
Sarrias-Mena, Raul [3 ]
Garcia-Trivino, Pablo [2 ]
Andres Garcia-Vazquez, Carlos [2 ]
Fernandez-Ramirez, Luis M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Fed Ctr Technol Educ Minas Gerais, Dept Electroelect, BR-35790000 Curvelo, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Cadiz, Dept Elect Engn, Res Grp Sustainable & Renewable Elect Technol PAI, Cadiz 11202, Algeciras, Spain
[3] Univ Cadiz, Res Grp Sustainable & Renewable Elect Technol PAI, Dept Engn Automat Elect & Comp Architecture & Net, Cadiz 11202, Algeciras, Spain
关键词
Computational modeling; Voltage control; Mathematical model; Control systems; Topology; Switches; Power system dynamics; Control system; modeling; quasi-Z-source inverter; wind turbine; CONVERTERS; DESIGN; VOLTAGE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104797
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Typically, permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG)-driven wind turbines (WTs) present a two-stage power converter topology based on a DC/DC boost converter and voltage source inverter. In this study, this configuration is substituted by a quasi-Z-source inverter (qZSI), which is an attractive solution for boosting and converting the voltage from DC to AC in a single stage. A 2 MW PMSG WT with qZSI was studied herein. A switched dynamic model (SDM) of the qZSI (including the modeling of all switches and firing pulses) is not recommended for steady-state stability studies, long-term simulations, or large electric power systems. For such studies, two averaged dynamic models are proposed in this work. Both models present the same control system as the SDM, except for the generation of firing pulses, which is not necessary in the averaged models. The two proposed models were evaluated and compared with the SDM in the large-scale WT under different operating conditions, such as wind speed fluctuations, variable power references, and grid disturbances (voltage sag and 3(rd) and 5(th) order harmonics injection), in order to demonstrate their adequacy to represent the system response with a high reduction in the simulation time and computational efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:114348 / 114358
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Four Quasi-Z-Source Inverters [J].
Anderson, Joel ;
Peng, F. Z. .
2008 IEEE POWER ELECTRONICS SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-10, 2008, :2743-2749
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P CCECE
[3]   Critical review of offshore wind turbine energy production and site potential assessment [J].
Arrambide, Inaki ;
Zubia, Itziar ;
Madariaga, Ander .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2019, 167 :39-47
[4]   Control of a new stand-alone wind turbine-based variable speed permanent magnet synchronous generator using quasi-Z-source inverter [J].
Bajestan, Mehran Moslehi ;
Madadi, Hamed ;
Shamsinejad, Mohammad Ali .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2019, 177
[5]  
Bajestan MM, 2019, 2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS, DRIVE SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE (PEDSTC), P558, DOI [10.1109/PEDSTC.2019.8697260, 10.1109/pedstc.2019.8697260]
[6]   Power Electronics Converters for Wind Turbine Systems [J].
Blaabjerg, Frede ;
Liserre, Marco ;
Ma, Ke .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2012, 48 (02) :708-719
[7]   Rectifier topologies for permanent magnet synchronous generator on wind energy conversion systems: A review [J].
de Freitas, Tiara R. S. ;
Menegaz, Paulo J. M. ;
Simonetti, Domingos S. L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :1334-1344
[8]  
de Oliveira-Assis L, 2020, 2020 20TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND 2020 4TH IEEE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS EUROPE (EEEIC/I&CPS EUROPE)
[9]   Double input Z-source inverter applicable in dual-star PMSG based wind turbine [J].
Dehghanzadeh, Ali Reza ;
Behjat, Vahid ;
Banaei, Mohamad Reza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 82 :49-57
[10]   An overview for the Z-Source Converter in motor drive applications [J].
Ellabban, Omar ;
Abu-Rub, Haitham .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 61 :537-555