Connecting ecosystem services science and policy in the field

被引:10
作者
Ruhl, J. B. [1 ]
Salzman, James [2 ,3 ]
Arnold, Craig Anthony [4 ,5 ]
Craig, Robin [6 ]
Hirokawa, Keith [7 ]
Olander, Lydia [8 ]
Palmer, Margaret [9 ]
Ricketts, Taylor H. [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Law, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Bren Sch Environm Sci & Management, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Louisville, Brandeis Sch Law, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[5] Univ Louisville, Dept Urban & Publ Affairs, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[6] Univ Southern Calif, Gould Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[7] Albany Law Sch, Albany, NY USA
[8] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC USA
[9] Univ Maryland, Natl Socioenvironm Synth Ctr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[10] Univ Vermont, Gund Inst Environm, Burlington, VT USA
[11] Univ Vermont, Rubenstein Sch Environm & Nat Resources, Burlington, VT USA
关键词
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION; MITIGATION; INDICATORS; VALUATION; PAYMENTS; IMPACTS; WETLAND;
D O I
10.1002/fee.2390
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Conservation and provision of ecosystem services (ES) have been adopted as high-level policy in many countries, yet there has been surprisingly little application of these broad policies in the field; for example, ES are rarely considered in permit issuance or other discrete agency actions. This large implementation gap arises in part because the science that drove general policy interest in ES differs from the science needed for practical application. A better understanding of the environmental policy toolkit can guide more effective research to support agency decisions. Here, we outline the framework used to teach environmental policy instruments through the "Five P's": prescription, property, penalty, payment, and persuasion. We then discuss the discrete ES research required to effectively implement each tool. To support greater conservation of ES in the field, scientists and policy makers must clearly recognize what each needs from the other.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 525
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Valuation of Ecosystem Services from Wetlands Mitigation in the United States [J].
Adusumilli, Naveen .
LAND, 2015, 4 (01) :182-196
[2]   Riparian landowner decision-making in the context of flooding: an application of the theory of planned behavior [J].
Allred S. ;
Gary G. .
Environment Systems and Decisions, 2019, 39 (4) :396-408
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, FED REGISTER, V73, P19594
[5]   An integrated approach to valuation and tradeoff analysis of ecosystem services for national forest decision-making [J].
Armatas, Christopher A. ;
Campbell, Robert M. ;
Watson, Alan E. ;
Borrie, William T. ;
Christensen, Neal ;
Venn, Tyron J. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 33 :1-18
[6]  
Arnold C.A., 2007, Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law, V22, P441
[7]   Developing China's Ecological Redline Policy using ecosystem services assessments for land use planning [J].
Bai, Yang ;
Wong, Christina P. ;
Jiang, Bo ;
Hughes, Alice C. ;
Wang, Min ;
Wang, Qing .
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 9
[8]   Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation [J].
BenDor, Todd ;
Brozovic, Nicholas .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2007, 40 (03) :349-364
[10]   Science for managing ecosystem services: Beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [J].
Carpenter, Stephen R. ;
Mooney, Harold A. ;
Agard, John ;
Capistrano, Doris ;
DeFries, Ruth S. ;
Diaz, Sandra ;
Dietz, Thomas ;
Duraiappah, Anantha K. ;
Oteng-Yeboah, Alfred ;
Pereira, Henrique Miguel ;
Perrings, Charles ;
Reid, Walter V. ;
Sarukhan, Jose ;
Scholes, Robert J. ;
Whyte, Anne .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (05) :1305-1312