Facilitators of and barriers to return to work after mild traumatic brain injury: A thematic analysis

被引:24
作者
Graff, Heidi Jeannet [1 ,2 ]
Deleu, Nicole W. [3 ]
Christiansen, Peter [3 ]
Rytter, Hana Mala [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Univ Hosp, Ctr Head & Orthopaed, Dept Anaesthesia,Rigshosp, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Danish Concuss Ctr, Amagerfaelledvej 56A, DK-2300 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Ctr Rehabil Brain Injury, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Psychol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[5] Univ Hosp Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Dept Neurol, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Mild traumatic brain injury; Concussion; Rehabilitation; Return to work; HEAD-INJURY; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1080/09602011.2020.1778489
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) may experience protracted symptoms affecting their ability to work. Several actors may facilitate or act as a barrier to a successful return to work (RTW). This qualitative study used semi-structured in-depth interviews with 22 adults with mTBI at 2-5 years post injury, targeting experiences of how different actors facilitated or acted as a barrier in the RTW process, and encompassed the mTBI trajectory from the acute phase to the post-acute phase. A thematic analysis with a hermeneutical phenomenological approach was used to analyse data. Three main themes emerged. (1) Worker-employer relationship: Workplace accommodations such as decreased working hours, modified working conditions, and support from co-workers were lacking. (2) The role of the general practitioner: The general practitioner was lacking treatment and referral opportunities and failed to provide the patient with relevant and individualized guidance. (3) Municipal case management: Participants perceived being met with distrust by social workers, follow-up assessments were too frequent, unnecessary, and did not target concussion, and rehabilitation was referred too late. Clinical practice guidelines to improve referral to relevant concussion rehabilitation in case of persistent symptoms are needed to inform clinicians, employers, and public institutions to facilitate a successful RTW.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1373
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Besk<dipthong ae>ftigelsesministeriet [The ministry of employment], 2019, DAN LAB MARK
[2]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of return to work after mild Traumatic brain injury [J].
Bloom, Ben ;
Thomas, Stephen ;
Ahrensberg, Jette Moller ;
Weaver, Rachel ;
Fowler, Alex ;
Bestwick, Jon ;
Harris, Tim ;
Pearse, Rupert .
BRAIN INJURY, 2018, 32 (13-14) :1623-1636
[3]  
Bonneterre V., 2013, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, V56, P652, DOI 10.1016/j.rehab.2013.10.001
[4]  
Booker James, 2019, Br J Neurosurg, V33, P367, DOI 10.1080/02688697.2019.1598542
[5]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual Res Psychol, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA]
[6]  
Cassidy J.D., 2014, ARCH PHYS MED REHABI, V95, pS201, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.010
[7]   Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Cassidy, JD ;
Carroll, LJ ;
Peloso, PM ;
Borg, J ;
von Holst, H ;
Holm, L ;
Kraus, J ;
Coronado, VG .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2004, 36 :28-60
[8]   Quality of return to work in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a prospective investigation of associations among post-concussion symptoms, neuropsychological functions, working status and stability [J].
Chu, Shao-Ying ;
Tsai, Yi-Hsin ;
Xiao, Sheng-Huang ;
Huang, Sheng-Jean ;
Yang, Chi-Cheng .
BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (12) :1674-1682
[9]   A systematic review of treatments for mild traumatic brain injury [J].
Comper, P ;
Bisschop, SM ;
Carnide, N ;
Tricco, A .
BRAIN INJURY, 2005, 19 (11) :863-880
[10]   Outpatient follow-up after mild traumatic brain injury: Results of the UPFRONT-study [J].
de Koning, M. E. ;
Scheenen, M. E. ;
van der Horn, H. J. ;
Hageman, G. ;
Roks, G. ;
Yilmaz, T. ;
Spikman, J. M. ;
van der Naalt, J. .
BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (08) :1102-1108