Hydrogen energy storage method selection using fuzzy axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process

被引：41

作者：

Karatas, Mumtaz ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Def Univ, Naval Acad, TR-34940 Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Bahcesehir Univ, TR-34353 Istanbul, Turkey

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY | 2020年 / 45卷 / 32期

关键词：

Fuzzy axiomatic design; Analytical hierarchy process; Hydrogen energy storage; Metal hydride; Chemical storage; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SUPPLY CHAIN; MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE; MCDM APPROACH; SYSTEM; MODEL; SETS; SUSTAINABILITY; TECHNOLOGIES; ENVIRONMENT;

D O I：

10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.130

中图分类号：

O64 [物理化学（理论化学）、化学物理学];

学科分类号：

070304 ; 081704 ;

摘要：

This paper presents an integrated Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (fAHP) and Weighted Fuzzy Axiomatic Design (wfAD) methodology for a strategic level problem of hydrogen energy storage (HES) method selection for Turkey. Considering alternatives of tank, metal hydride and chemical storage, we design our decision problem with respect to five assessment criteria as weight, capacity, storage loss and leak, reliability, and total system cost. In the solution methodology, we first implement fAHP to determine criteria weights by incorporating linguistic judgement and vague information. Next, we define functional requirements and design parameters for the selection problem and use wfAD to compare alternatives. After implementing the proposed integrated approach, we perform additional sensitivity analysis experiments to test the robustness of the solution with respect to changes in functional requirements. (C) 2019 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：16227 / 16238

页数：12

共 86 条

[1] Hydrogen energy, economy and storage: Review and recommendation [J].

Abe, J. O. ;

Popoola, A. P. I. ;

Ajenifuja, E. ;

Popoola, O. M. .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2019, 44 (29) :15072-15086

[2] A new hybrid decision framework for prioritizing funding allocation to Iran's energy sector [J].

Alipour, M. ;

Alighaleh, S. ;

Hafezi, R. ;

Omranievardi, M. .

ENERGY, 2017, 121 :388-402

[3] Mine closure risk management: An integration of 3D risk model and MCDM techniques [J].

Amirshenava, Sina ;

Osanloo, Morteza .

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 184 :389-401

[4]

[Anonymous], 2001, MIT PAPPALARDO SERIE

[5] Axiomatic design of automotive suspension systems [J].

Bae, S ;

Lee, JM ;

Chu, CN .

CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 51 (01) :115-118

[6] An axiomatic design approach in development of nanofluid coolants [J].

Bang, In Cheol ;

Heo, Gyunyoung .

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (01) :75-90

[7] A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications [J].

Baumann, Manuel ;

Weil, Marcel ;

Peters, Jens F. ;

Chibeles-Martins, Nelson ;

Moniz, Antonio B. .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 107 :516-534

[8] Decision theory and the evaluation of risks and benefits of clinical trials [J].

Bernabe, Rosemarie D. C. ;

van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. ;

Raaijmakers, Jan A. M. ;

van Delden, Johannes J. M. .

DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2012, 17 (23-24) :1263-1269

[9]

Buyukozkan G., 2019, INT C INT FUZZ SYST, P598

[10] Application of a new combined intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM approach based on axiomatic design methodology for the supplier selection problem [J].

Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;

Gocer, Fethullah .

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 52 :1222-1238

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 →