Streamlined life cycle assessment of single use technologies in biopharmaceutical manufacture

被引:25
作者
Budzinski, Kristi [1 ]
Constable, David [2 ]
D'Aquila, Daniel [3 ]
Smith, Phillip [3 ]
Madabhushi, Sri R. [4 ]
Whiting, Andy [5 ]
Costelloe, Tom [5 ]
Collins, Michael [5 ]
机构
[1] Genentech Inc, 1 DNA Way, San Francisco, CA 94080 USA
[2] ACS Green Chem Inst, 1155 Sixteenth St NW, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, 709 Swedeland Rd,UE3838, King Of Prussia, PA 19406 USA
[4] Merck & Co Inc, 2000 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, NJ 07033 USA
[5] Environm Resources Management ERM, 2nd Floor Exchequer Court,33 St Mary Axe, London EC3A 8AA, England
关键词
Biologics; Life cycle assessment; Single use technology; Monoclonal antibody; Process intensification;
D O I
10.1016/j.nbt.2022.01.002
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The rapid growth of biologics as the preferred modality in several therapeutic areas has led to changes in the environmental profile of pharmaceutical manufacturing for some companies. The increased use of single use technologies (SUT) in biologics manufacturing has been accompanied by a greater public awareness of plastics waste, but the full life cycle environmental impacts of SUT have had limited study. Therefore, a segment of American Chemical Society Green Chemistry Institute Pharmaceutical Roundtable member companies undertook a streamlined cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment on a biological bulk drug substance (BDS) manufacturing process utilizing SUT at the 2000 L scale. The goal of this study was to highlight where pharmaceutical companies, and biologics producers in particular, can reduce the environmental impact of their drug substance manufacturing. The results have shown that the largest contribution to the life cycle environmental impact for SUT was found to be the electricity used to operate the plant. Interestingly, across all impact categories, the contribution to the environmental footprint from end-of-life due to the use of plastic SUT was extremely small. Although not quantified in this study, these findings and others suggest operational changes that increase process efficiency and decrease time in plant are among the best strategies for reducing the life cycle environmental impact of biologics manufacturing.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 36
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, UNFCC PAR AGR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2020, MSD CORP RESP REP 20
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, OUR EFF MIN ENV FOOT
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, ILCD INT LIF CYCL DA
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2014, SAV EN CLEANR
  • [6] Barbaroux M, 2020, BIOPROCESS INT
  • [7] Introduction of a process mass intensity metric for biologics
    Budzinski, Kristi
    Blewis, Megan
    Dahlin, Philip
    D'Aquila, Daniel
    Esparza, Julia
    Gavin, Jack
    Ho, Sa V.
    Hutchens, Clarice
    Kahn, David
    Koenig, Stefan G.
    Kottmeier, Robert
    Millard, Jeff
    Snyder, Matt
    Stanard, Brad
    Sun, Lixin
    [J]. NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2019, 49 : 37 - 42
  • [8] DAquila D, 2017, BENCHMARKING BIOPHAR
  • [9] Using the Right Green Yardstick: Why Process Mass intensity Is Used in the Pharmaceutical Industry To Drive More Sustainable Processes
    Jimenez-Gonzalez, Concepcion
    Ponder, Celia S.
    Broxterman, Quirinus B.
    Manley, Julie B.
    [J]. ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 15 (04) : 912 - 917
  • [10] Quantitative assessment of environmental impact of biologics manufacturing using process mass intensity analysis
    Madabhushi, Sri R.
    Gavin, John
    Xu, Sen
    Cutler, Collette
    Chmielowski, Rebecca
    Rayfield, William
    Tugcu, Nihal
    Chen, Hao
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 2018, 34 (06) : 1566 - 1573