Children With a Soft Scalp Hematoma Presenting to the Emergency Department More Than 24 Hours After a Head Injury

Objectives The soft scalp hematoma is one of the clinical markers used as a predictor for the presence of intracranial injury in children with a head trauma. We evaluated the significance of time presentation in the management of these patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of children and adolescents aged 0 to <18 years by comparing the clinical, radiological, and epidemiological features in those presenting within 24 hours with those presenting greater than 24 hours after a head injury. Results We identified 188 and 98 patients with early presentation and late presentation, respectively. The percentage of children aged 0 to <6 months was lower in those with late presentation (6.12%) than those with early presentation (20.21%) with a significant difference (P < .001). Likewise, the percentage of children aged >= 24 months was lower in children with late presentation (7.14%) than those with early presentation (34.04%) with a significant difference (P < .001). The severe mechanism rate was more elevated in early presentation (38.83%) with a significant difference (-14.34%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -25.34% to -3.34%; P = .015). The symptom rate resulted higher in early presentation (14.36%) with a significant difference (-11.30%; 95% CI, -17.36% to 5.22%; P = .003). The parietal scalp hematoma occurred mostly in children with late presentation (85.71%) with a significant difference (19.76%; 95% CI, 10.07% to 29.45%; P < .001). The occipital scalp hematoma rate was higher in early presentation with a significant difference (-17.50%; 95% CI, -22.99% to -12.12%; P < .001). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of different types of intracranial injury, and the only 5 patients needing a neurosurgical intervention were exclusively children with an early presentation. Conclusion Although children with soft scalp hematoma presenting to the emergency department greater than 24 hours after a head injury may have pathological findings on computed tomography, all of them had a good short- and long-term outcomes, and no neurological deterioration aroused the medical attention on follow-up. For this subset of patients that does not experience red flags (neurological symptoms, focal signs on examination, or severe injury mechanism), a wait-and-see approach might be more appropriate rather than neuroimaging.