Ergodicity of the recent geomagnetic field

被引:6
作者
De Santis, A. [1 ,2 ]
Qamili, E. [1 ,3 ]
Cianchini, G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Ist Nazl Geofis & Vulcanol, Sez Roma 2, I-00143 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ G DAnnunzio, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ Siena, Scuola Dottorato Sci Polari, I-53100 Siena, Italy
关键词
Geomagnetic field; Ergodicity; Chaos; Geomagnetic field prediction; EARTHS MAGNETIC-FIELD; SECULAR VARIATION; SATELLITE DATA; TIME-SERIES; CHAOS; MODEL; INFORMATION; ENTROPY; POMME; CHAMP;
D O I
10.1016/j.pepi.2011.04.008
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The geomagnetic field is a fundamental property of our planet: its study would allow us to understand those processes of Earth's interior, which act in its outer core and produce the main field. Knowledge of whether the field is ergodic, i.e. whether time averages correspond to phase space averages, is an important question since, if this were true, it would point out a strong spatio-temporal coupling amongst the components of the dynamical system behind the present geomagnetic field generation. Another consequence would be that many computations, usually undertaken with many difficulties in the phase space, can be made in the conventional time domain. We analyse the temporal behaviour of the deviation between predictive and definitive geomagnetic global models for successive intervals from 1965 to 2010, finding a similar exponential growth with time. Also going back in time (at around 1600 and 1900 by using the GUFM1 model) confirms the same findings. This result corroborates previous chaotic analyses made in a reconstructed phase space from geomagnetic observatory time series, confirming the chaotic character of the recent geomagnetic field with no reliable prediction after around 6 years from definitive values, and disclosing the potentiality of estimating important entropic quantities of the field by time averages. Although more tests will be necessary, some of our analyses confirm the efforts to improve the representation of the geomagnetic field with more detailed secular variation and acceleration. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 110
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Geomagnetic Observations for Main Field Studies: From Ground to Space
    Matzka, J.
    Chulliat, A.
    Mandea, M.
    Finlay, C. C.
    Qamili, E.
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2010, 155 (1-4) : 29 - 64
  • [22] Chaotic dynamic characteristics of Z component in geomagnetic variation field
    Niu Chao
    Li Xi-Hai
    Liu Dai-Zhi
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2010, 59 (05) : 3077 - 3087
  • [23] Intensity of the geomagnetic field in Europe for the last 3 ka: Influence of data quality on geomagnetic field modeling
    Pavon-Carrasco, Francisco Javier
    Gomez-Paccard, Miriam
    Herve, Gwenael
    Osete, Maria Luisa
    Chauvin, Annick
    GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS, 2014, 15 (06) : 2515 - 2530
  • [24] GEOMAGNETIC FIELD SURVEY ACTIVITIES IN LITHUANIA
    Buga, Arunas
    Obuchovski, Romuald
    Petroskevicius, Petras
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2011, : 1306 - 1309
  • [25] On regional modeling of the main geomagnetic field
    Verbanac, Giuli
    GEOFIZIKA, 2007, 24 (01) : 1 - 27
  • [26] Polar ionospheric currents and high temporal resolution geomagnetic field models
    Kloss, Clemens
    Finlay, Christopher C.
    Laundal, Karl M.
    Olsen, Nils
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 235 (02) : 1736 - 1760
  • [27] Modeling the geomagnetic field over Croatia
    Verbanac, Giuliana
    GEOFIZIKA, 2011, 28 (02) : 313 - 325
  • [28] Dynamical similarity of geomagnetic field reversals
    Valet, Jean-Pierre
    Fournier, Alexandre
    Courtillot, Vincent
    Herrero-Bervera, Emilio
    NATURE, 2012, 490 (7418) : 89 - +
  • [29] Chinese Geomagnetic Reference Field 2020 by the Revised Surface Spline Method
    Chen, Bin
    Yuan, Jiehao
    Ni, Zhe
    Wang, Can
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (05):
  • [30] Recent geomagnetic secular variation from Swarm and ground observatories as estimated in the CHAOS-6 geomagnetic field model
    Christopher C. Finlay
    Nils Olsen
    Stavros Kotsiaros
    Nicolas Gillet
    Lars Tøffner-Clausen
    Earth, Planets and Space, 68