Estimation of the total rectal dose of radical external beam and intracavitary radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer using the deformable image registration method

被引:29
作者
Hayashi, Kazuhiko [1 ]
Isohashi, Fumiaki [1 ]
Akino, Yuichi [2 ]
Wakai, Nobuhide [3 ]
Mabuchi, Seiji [4 ]
Suzuki, Osamu [1 ]
Seo, Yuji [1 ]
Ootani, Yuki [1 ]
Sumida, Iori [1 ]
Yoshioka, Yasuo [1 ]
Kimura, Tadashi [4 ]
Ogawa, Kazuhiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Suita Tokushukai Hosp, Dept Radiol, Osaka, Japan
[3] Nara Med Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nara, Japan
[4] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Suita, Osaka 5650871, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
DIR; cervical cancer; rectal dose; brachytherapy; BRACHYTHERAPY; RECOMMENDATIONS; PARAMETERS; TERMS;
D O I
10.1093/jrr/rru127
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We adapted the deformable image registration (DIR) technique to accurately calculate the cumulative intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) rectal dose for treating uterine cervical cancer. A total of 14 patients with primary cervical cancer radically treated with ICRT and EBRT were analysed using the Velocity AI(TM) software. Computed tomography (CT) images were registered, and EBRT and ICBT dose distributions were determined. Cumulative D-2cm(3), D-1cm(3) and D-0.1cm(3) were calculated by simple addition of fractional values or by DIR. The accuracy of DIR was evaluated by means of a virtual phantom mimicking the rectum. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated to evaluate rectal contour concordance between CT images before and after DIR. Virtual phantom analysis revealed that the average difference between the DIR-based phantom D-mean and the simple phantom D-mean was 1.9 +/- 2.5 Gy (EQD(2)), and the DIR method included an uncertainty of similar to 8.0%. The mean DSC between reference CT and CT was significantly improved after DIR (EBRT: 0.43 vs 0.85, P < 0.005; ICBT: 0.60 vs 0.87, P < 0.005). The average simple rectal D-2cm(3), D-1cm(3) and D-0.1cm(3) values were 77.6, 81.6 and 91.1 Gy (EQD(2)), respectively; the DIR-based values were 76.2, 79.5 and 87.6 Gy, respectively. The simple addition values were overestimated, on average, by 3.1, 3.7 and 5.5 Gy, respectively, relative to the DIR-based values. In conclusion, the difference between the simple rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameter addition and DIR-based cumulative rectal doses increased with decreasing DVH parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 552
页数:7
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Estimation of Rectal Dose Using Daily Megavoltage Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Deformable Image Registration [J].
Akino, Yuichi ;
Yoshioka, Yasuo ;
Fukuda, Shoichi ;
Maruoka, Shintaroh ;
Takahashi, Yutaka ;
Yagi, Masashi ;
Mizuno, Hirokazu ;
Isohashi, Fumiaki ;
Ogawa, Kazuhiko .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (03) :602-608
[2]   Simple DVH parameter addition as compared to deformable registration for bladder dose accumulation in cervix cancer brachytherapy [J].
Andersen, Else Stougard ;
Noe, Karsten Ostergaard ;
Sorensen, Thomas Sangild ;
Nielsen, Soren Kynde ;
Fokdal, Lars ;
Paludan, Merete ;
Lindegaard, Jacob Christian ;
Tanderup, Kari .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (01) :52-57
[3]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group (IV): Basic principles and parameters for MR imaging within the frame of image based adaptive cervix cancer brachytherapy [J].
Dimopoulos, Johannes C. A. ;
Petrow, Peter ;
Tanderup, Kari ;
Petric, Primoz ;
Berger, Daniel ;
Kirisits, Christian ;
Pedersen, Erik M. ;
van Limbergen, Erik ;
Haie-Meder, Christine ;
Poetter, Richard .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 103 (01) :113-122
[4]   THE LINEAR-QUADRATIC FORMULA AND PROGRESS IN FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY [J].
FOWLER, JF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (740) :679-694
[5]   DOSE-VOLUME HISTOGRAM PARAMETERS AND LATE SIDE EFFECTS IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGE-GUIDED ADAPTIVE CERVICAL CANCER BRACHYTHERAPY [J].
Georg, Petra ;
Lang, Stefan ;
Dimopoulos, Johannes C. A. ;
Doerr, Wolfgang ;
Sturdza, Alina E. ;
Berger, Daniel ;
Georg, Dietmar ;
Kirisits, Christian ;
Poetter, Richard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 79 (02) :356-362
[6]   Recommendations from Gynaecological (GYN) GEC-ESTRO Working Group* (I):: concepts and terms in 3D image based 3D treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy with emphasis on MRI assessment of GTV and CTV [J].
Haie-Meder, C ;
Pötter, R ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Briot, E ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimopoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Hellebust, TP ;
Kirisits, C ;
Lang, SF ;
Muschitz, S ;
Nevinson, J ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Wachter-Gerstner, N .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 74 (03) :235-245
[7]   RECTAL DOSE AND SOURCE STRENGTH OF THE HIGH-DOSE-RATE IRIDIUM-192 BOTH AFFECT LATE RECTAL BLEEDING AFTER INTRACAVITARY RADIATION THERAPY FOR UTERINE CERVICAL CARCINOMA [J].
Isohashi, Fumiaki ;
Yoshioka, Yasuo ;
Koizumi, Masahiko ;
Suzuki, Osamu ;
Konishi, Koji ;
Sumida, Iori ;
Takahashi, Yutaka ;
Ogata, Toshiyuki ;
Kotsuma, Tadayuki ;
Inoue, Takehiro .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 77 (03) :758-764
[8]  
Joiner M, 2009, BASIC CLIN RADIOBIOL, V4th, P116
[9]   A multicentre comparison of the dosimetric impact of inter- and intra-fractional anatomical variations in fractionated cervix cancer brachytherapy [J].
Nesvacil, Nicole ;
Tanderup, Kari ;
Hellebust, Taran P. ;
De Leeuw, Astrid ;
Lang, Stefan ;
Mohamed, Sandy ;
Jamema, Swamidas V. ;
Anderson, Clare ;
Poetter, Richard ;
Kirisits, Christian .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 107 (01) :20-25
[10]   Recommendations from gynaecological (GYN) GEC ESTRO working group (II):: Concepts and terms in 3D image-based treatment planning in cervix cancer brachytherapy -: 3D dose volume parameters and aspects of 3D image-based anatomy, radiation physics, radiobiotogy [J].
Pötter, R ;
Haie-Meder, C ;
Van Limbergen, E ;
Barillot, I ;
De Brabandere, M ;
Dimpoulos, J ;
Dumas, I ;
Erickson, B ;
Lang, S ;
Nulens, A ;
Petrow, P ;
Rownd, J ;
Kirisits, C .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2006, 78 (01) :67-77