Post-gadolinium evaluation of intracranial tumours: a comparative study of Spin Echo, Fast Spin Echo, Gradient Echo T1-weighted sequences, with and without Magnetization Transfer

被引:0
作者
Aprile, I
Lavaroni, A
Scott, CA
Budai, R
Beltrami, CA
Fabris, G
机构
[1] S Maria della Misericordia Gen Hosp, Dept Neuroradiol, Udine, Italy
[2] Univ Udine, Inst Pathol, I-33100 Udine, Italy
[3] S Maria della Misericordia Gen Hosp, Dept Neurol Clin Neurophysiol, Udine, Italy
来源
RIVISTA DI NEURORADIOLOGIA | 2001年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
brain tumours; magnetic resonance; comparative studies; magnetization transfer contrast;
D O I
10.1177/197140090101400303
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study compares the use of six different post-gadolinium T1-weighted sequences on intracranial tumours with the aim of evaluating their efficacy in terms of lesion and edema contrast resolution and cortex visualization. Forty-eight intracranial neoplastic lesions were evaluated after contrast media administration by means of the following Tl-weighted sequences: Fast Spin-Echo (FSE), Spin-Echo (SE) and Gradient-Echo (GE) with and without Magnetization Transfer (MT) pulse. For each technique tumour/background contrast resolution (T/B CR), oedema/background contrast resolution (E/B CR) and white matter/grey matter contrast resolution (WM/GM CR) were calculated. GE sequences, with and without MT, showed the lowest contrast resolution values for all parameters. FSE MT sequences showed the highest T/B CR values. SE sequences, instead, showed the best E/B and WM/GM CR values. FSE and SE MT values were intermediate between FSE MT and SE sequences. No sequence had high values for all contrast resolution parameters. The sequence with the best T/B CR was the FSE MT, but that with the best anatomic peritumoural edema and cortex definition was SE. Both FSE MT and SE T1-weighted sequences may be acquired to obtain accurate post-gadolinium tumour evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] CHAPPELL PM, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P37
  • [2] Finelli DA, 1998, AM J NEURORADIOL, V19, P59
  • [3] FINELLI DA, 1994, RADIOLOGY, V190, P533
  • [4] DYNAMIC STUDIES OF GADOLINIUM UPTAKE IN BRAIN-TUMORS USING INVERSION-RECOVERY ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING
    GOWLAND, P
    MANSFIELD, P
    BULLOCK, P
    STEHLING, M
    WORTHINGTON, B
    FIRTH, J
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 26 (02) : 241 - 258
  • [5] Half-dose gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging with magnetization transfer technique in brain tumors: Comparison with conventional contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Han, D
    Chang, KH
    Han, MH
    Cho, JY
    Han, SW
    Kim, HD
    Seong, SO
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (01) : 189 - 193
  • [6] Macroscopic tumor volume of malignant glioma determined by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with and without magnetization transfer contrast
    Hawighorst, H
    Schreiber, W
    Knopp, MV
    Essig, M
    EngenhartCabilic, R
    Brix, G
    vanKaick, G
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 14 (10) : 1119 - 1126
  • [7] Knauth M, 1996, AM J NEURORADIOL, V17, P1853
  • [8] KURKI T, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1727
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with gadopentetate dimeglumine-DTPA: Comparison of T1-weighted spin-echo and 3D gradient-echo sequences
    Li, DB
    Haacke, EM
    Tarr, RW
    Venkatesan, R
    Lin, WL
    Wielopolski, P
    [J]. JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1996, 6 (03): : 415 - 424
  • [10] CEREBRAL INFARCTION - EFFECTS OF DOSE AND MAGNETIZATION-TRANSFER SATURATION AT GADOLINIUM-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING
    MATHEWS, VP
    KING, JC
    ELSTER, AD
    HAMILTON, CA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 547 - 552