Farm- and community-level factors underlying the profitability of fertiliser usage for Ethiopian smallholder farmers

被引:8
作者
Assefa, B. T. [1 ,2 ]
Reidsma, P. [1 ]
Chamberlin, J. [3 ]
van Ittersum, M. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Plant Prod Syst, NL-6700 AK Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[3] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
Maize; fertiliser; profitability; intensification; Ethiopia; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA; CYCLING EFFICIENCIES; INPUT USE; MAIZE; INTENSIFICATION; DETERMINANTS; RESOURCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/03031853.2021.1984958
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
While adoption rates for inorganic fertiliser are relatively high in Ethiopia, application rates are generally considered agronomically suboptimal. Using recent data on Ethiopian smallholder maize producers, we showed that maize response to nitrogen, and the profitability of fertiliser use depended on maize agronomy. The agronomic optimum ranged from 0 to 344 kg/ha with a mean value of 209 kg/ha. The actual nitrogen application rates were only about half the agronomic optimum, on average, and were less than the farm-specific economic optimum on 80% of maize fields. The average economic optimum level was 145 kg N/ha, but when we account for risk aversion, the resulting average optimum level is very close to the average observed usage level of 88 kg N/ha. Addressing risk aversion may help to induce greater levels of fertiliser investments at current prices and yield response rates. Our analysis also suggests that key pathways for increasing the economic returns to smallholder fertiliser investments include: complementing nitrogen inputs with phosphorus inputs and improved varieties, using lower levels of nitrogen under intercropping and manure inputs, enabling farmers to delay output sales beyond the immediate post-harvest period, and lowering the costs of accessing input and output markets.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 479
页数:20
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Factors that transformed maize productivity in Ethiopia [J].
Abate, Tsedeke ;
Shiferaw, Bekele ;
Menkir, Abebe ;
Wegary, Dagne ;
Kebede, Yilma ;
Tesfaye, Kindie ;
Kassie, Menale ;
Bogale, Gezahegn ;
Tadesse, Berhanu ;
Keno, Tolera .
FOOD SECURITY, 2015, 7 (05) :965-981
[2]  
Ahmed M H., 2017, Journal of Economic Structures, V6, P1, DOI [10.1186/s40008-017-0093-8, DOI 10.1186/S40008-017-0093-8]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Statistical Bulletin
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Statistical Bulletin
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Statistical Bulletin
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Statistical Bulletin
[7]   Usage and Impacts of Technologies and Management Practices in Ethiopian Smallholder Maize Production [J].
Assefa, Banchayehu Tessema ;
Chamberlin, Jordan ;
Van Ittersum, Martin K. ;
Reidsma, Pytrik .
AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (10)
[8]   Unravelling the variability and causes of smallholder maize yield gaps in Ethiopia [J].
Assefa, Banchayehu Tessema ;
Chamberlin, Jordan ;
Reidsma, Pytrik ;
Silva, Joao Vasco ;
van Ittersum, Martin K. .
FOOD SECURITY, 2020, 12 (01) :83-103
[9]   Re-examining appropriate mechanization in Eastern and Southern Africa: two-wheel tractors, conservation agriculture, and private sector involvement [J].
Baudron, Frederic ;
Sims, Brian ;
Justice, Scott ;
Kahan, David G. ;
Rose, Richard ;
Mkomwa, Saidi ;
Kaumbutho, Pascal ;
Sariah, John ;
Nazare, Raymond ;
Moges, Girma ;
Gerard, Bruno .
FOOD SECURITY, 2015, 7 (04) :889-904
[10]  
Breman, 2019, FED WORLD FOOD SECUR