German Aortic Root Repair Registry - Insights From the First 400 Consecutive Patients

被引:3
作者
Kari, Fabian A.
Misfeld, Martin
Borger, Michael
Rylski, Bartosz
Zimmer, Emmanuel
Siepe, Matthias
Hagl, Christian
Detter, Christian
Petersen, Johannes
Tsvelodub, Stanislav
Richardt, Doreen
Werner, Paul
Andreas, Martin
Pichlmaier, Maximilian
Mueller, Christoph S.
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Heart Ctr Freiburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Heart Ctr Freiburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Bad Krozingen, Germany
[3] Leipzig Heart Ctr, Dept Cardiac Surg, Leipzig, Germany
[4] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiac Surg, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Heart & Vasc Ctr Hamburg, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Hamburg, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Cardiac & Thorac Vasc Surg, Campus Luebeck, Lubeck, Germany
[7] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Cardiac Surg, Vienna, Austria
关键词
VALVE; REPLACEMENT; REIMPLANTATION; REGURGITATION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND The objective was to provide initial data from our prospective valve-sparing aortic root replacement (V-SARR) registry and reasons for conversion to prosthetic aortic valve replacement. METHODS Six centers established an intention-to-treat-design V-SARR-registry (the German Aortic Root Repair Registry; first patient in October 2016); the main inclusion criterion was being scheduled for V-SARK as plan A. Clinical information, operative details, intraoperative valve/root measurements, and clinical and transthoracic echocardiography follow-up-data are documented. RESULTS Of a total of 449 patients, we report data for 401 (81 % male; mean age 51 +/- 14 years). Overall, 350 patients underwent V-SARR as scheduled, group A (David variants I 55%, III 2%, IV 13%, V 24%, V-Stanford 2%, and Yacoub remodeling 2%); and 51 were converted to aortic valve replacement (group B). Median follow-up was 11 months (range, 0 to 2.6 years), cumulative follow-up was 279 patient-years. In group B, there were fewer connective tissue disorders (6% vs 16%), fewer patients had left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 50% (60% vs 90%), more had bicuspid aortic valves (45% vs 28%), and fewer patients had preoperative none/trace aortic regurgitation (2% vs 20%). Fewer patients in group B had rare types of bicuspid aortic valve (fused N/L, R/N, 10% vs 30%) and more had unbalanced roots (56% vs 40%). Immediate postoperative aortic regurgitation was none/trace in 79% and mild in 20%. At 30 days, the mean transvalvular pressure gradient was 7 +/- 5 mm Hg. None of the patients died in hospital; two strokes occurred. One patient needed early aortic valve replacement as redo surgery. CONCLUSIONS The main factors causing surgeons to convert a planned V-SARK to aortic valve replacement include asymmetry of aortic valve/root, severity of aortic regurgitation, safety reasons (left ventricular ejection fraction), and bicuspid aortic valves (but not rare types). The German Aortic Root Repair Registry will help us identify the impact on long-term outcomes of preoperative and postoperative valvular anatomy and various V-SARK types. (C) 2022 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
引用
收藏
页码:608 / 615
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   A nationwide survey of aortic valve surgery in Japan: current status of valve preservation in cases with aortic regurgitation [J].
Arimura, Satoshi ;
Seki, Masahiro ;
Sasaki, Kenichi ;
Takai, Hideaki ;
Matsuhama, Minoru ;
Kunihara, Takashi ;
Okita, Yutaka ;
Takanashi, Shuichiro ;
Komiya, Tatsuhiko ;
Yaku, Hitoshi ;
Okabayashi, Hitoshi ;
Takemura, Hirofumi ;
Arai, Hirokuni ;
Sawazaki, Masaru ;
Matsui, Yoshiro ;
Shiiya, Norihiko .
GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 65 (08) :429-434
[2]   Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement as First-Choice Strategy in Acute Type a Aortic Dissection [J].
Aubin, Hug ;
Akhyari, Payam ;
Rellecke, Philipp ;
Pawlitza, Christina ;
Petrov, George ;
Lichtenberg, Artur ;
Kamiya, Hiroyuki .
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2019, 6
[3]   Aortic valve-sparing root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: long-term outcome with the David I procedure over 20 years [J].
Beckmann, Erik ;
Martens, Andreas ;
Krueger, Heike ;
Korte, Wilhelm ;
Kaufeld, Tim ;
Stettinger, Alissa ;
Haverich, Axel ;
Shrestha, Malakh Lal .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 58 (01) :86-93
[4]   Relevance of Leaflet Prolapse to the Indication Policy for Aortic Valve-Sparing Root Replacement [J].
Borowski, Andreas ;
Minol, Jan-Philipp ;
Kroepil, Patric ;
Rellecke, Philipp ;
Hehdiani, Arash ;
Dalyanoglu, Hannan .
HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2019, 22 (03) :E241-E246
[5]   Commentary: Are the results of reimplantation of the aortic valve the same for bicuspid and tricuspid valves? [J].
David, Tirone E. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 163 (01) :64-65
[6]   Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years [J].
David, Tirone E. ;
David, Carolyn M. ;
Feindel, Christopher M. ;
Manlhiot, Cedric .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 153 (02) :232-238
[7]   Aortic Valve Sparing in Different Aortic Valve and Aortic Root Conditions [J].
David, Tirone E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 68 (06) :654-664
[8]   Valve sparing root replacement: an update [J].
De Paulis, Ruggero ;
Scaffa, Raffaele ;
Chirichilli, Ilaria .
CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 35 (02) :95-100
[9]   Valve-sparing root surgery in congenital heart disease-Shoulda, coulda... [J].
Dearani, Joseph A. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 155 (06) :E177-E178
[10]   Valve -Sparing Root Replacement Versus Composite Valve Grafting in Aortic Root Dilation: A Meta -Analysis [J].
Elbatarny, Malak ;
Tam, Derrick Y. ;
Edelman, J. James ;
Rocha, Rodolfo V. ;
Chu, Michael W. A. ;
Peterson, Mark D. ;
El-Hamamsy, Ismail ;
Appoo, Jehangir J. ;
Friedrich, Jan O. ;
Boodhwani, Munir ;
Yanagawa, Bobby ;
Ouzounian, Maral .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 110 (01) :296-306