Energy performance and well-to-wheel analysis of different powertrain solutions for freight transportation

被引:16
作者
Lombardi, Simone [1 ]
Tribioli, Laura [1 ]
Guandalini, Giulio [2 ]
Iora, Paolo [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Niccolo Cusano, Dept Ind Engn, Rome, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Energy, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Brescia, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Brescia, Italy
关键词
Well-to-Wheel; Plug-in hybrid electric vehicle; Battery electric vehicle; Fuel cell vehicle; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; ELECTRIC TRUCKS; DUTY DIESEL; VEHICLE; BATTERY; SYSTEM; CONSUMPTION; MANAGEMENT; OPTIMIZATION; INTEGRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.181
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this paper we compare energy performance and environmental impact of four nominal weight classes of commercial vehicles with different powertrain solutions: conventional diesel internal combustion engine (ICE), Plug-In Electric Vehicle (PHEV), Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) and Plug-In Fuel Cell Vehicle (PFCV). First, the sizing of the various powertrain components is performed adopting a simplified calculation based on a rule-based model. Then, the energy performances are evaluated through simulation over different driving cycles carried out with a self-developed Matlab/Simulink (R) simulator tool based on a forward-looking approach, that implements a control strategy that targets the instant velocity specified by the driving cycle. We show that when the optimal control strategy based on the Pontryagin's Minimum Principle is adopted, the fuel consumption significantly reduces with respect to the simplified rule-based control strategy approach. Finally, the overall specific energy consumption and the corresponding greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions are evaluated by means of a well-to-wheel analysis, considering various possible scenarios, covering the main traditional and low emission solutions for production, transportation and distribution of diesel, electricity and hydrogen. As expected, the highest GHG emissions are obtained in case of fossil origin of the energy carrier, with maximum value of 270 gCO(2)/km/kg in case of 3.5 ton truck with traditional diesel ICE, due to the low powertrain efficiency compared to the other considered solutions. Moreover, both the specific primary energy consumption and GHG emissions proportionally reduce with tonnage, as a consequence of the progressive reduction of the fraction of the powertrain weight with respect to the total vehicle mass. (C) 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12535 / 12554
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FUEL CELLS HYDROGEN
[2]   Battery electric propulsion: An option for heavy-duty vehicles? Results from a Swiss case-study [J].
Cabukoglu, Emir ;
Georges, Gil ;
Kung, Lukas ;
Pareschi, Giacomo ;
Boulouchos, Konstantinos .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, 88 :107-123
[3]  
Caputo A., 2018, 2802018 ISPRA
[4]   A methodology to evaluate the competitiveness of electric delivery trucks [J].
Davis, Brian A. ;
Figliozzi, Miguel A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2013, 49 (01) :8-23
[5]   Experimental and numerical study of hydrogen addition in a natural gas heavy duty engine for a bus vehicle [J].
De Simio, Luigi ;
Gambino, Michele ;
Iannaccone, Sabato .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (16) :6865-6873
[6]   Combustion and emission characteristics of a hydrogen-diesel dual-fuel engine [J].
Dimitriou, Povlos ;
Kumar, Madan ;
Tsujimura, Taku ;
Suzuki, Yasumasa .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (29) :13605-13617
[7]  
Fajri P, 2008, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPTIMIZATION OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT, VOL II A AND B, P287
[8]   Power-based electric vehicle energy consumption model: Model development and validation [J].
Fiori, Chiara ;
Ahn, Kyoungho ;
Rakha, Hesham A. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 168 :257-268
[9]  
G. Fige Institute, 1994, 10405316 FIGE
[10]  
Geering HP, 2007, OPTIMAL CONTROL ENG