Biofuels for the Bay: Cellulosic Double Crops in the Chesapeake Watershed

被引:0
|
作者
Baxter, R. [1 ]
Plakkat, A. [1 ]
Camargo, G. [1 ]
Dubin, M. [1 ]
Rotz, C. A. [1 ]
Roth, G. [1 ]
Richard, T. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
来源
2009 BIOENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE | 2009年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
For over two decades, technical experts and policy makers have been encouraging the use of cover crops throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed as a way to reduce nutrient and soil losses and improve water quality. While such practices have been heavily adopted in some regions, the economic incentives have been inadequate across much of the watershed. With the advent of demand for cellulosic biomass, there is increasing interest in planting energy crops as double crops, intensifying production while enhancing environmental outcomes from management of existing row crop acres. In this study, we predicted biomass production from a winter rye cover crop on corn grain land and soybean land that did not currently have a small grain winter crop. Based on the 2007 USDA Census of Agriculture, the Chesapeake Bay watershed included 604,600 hectares of corn grain and 431,500 hectares of soybean production, of which approximately 489,500 and 370,300 hectares respectively had no cover crop in 2007. Rye yield was modeled using the Integrated Farm System Model (IFSM) adjusting for different typical planting dates and climate conditions across the region. Within the Chesapeake Watershed, the potential biomass from such a double crop strategy is substantial, on the order of 2 million Mg of rye biomass dry matter, providing a significant contribution to sustainable energy, water, and soils.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Adoption of cover crops in Pennsylvania's Chesapeake Bay watershed
    Duiker, S. W.
    Richards, S.
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2023, 78 (04) : 376 - 383
  • [2] Tradeoffs when interseeding cover crops into corn across the Chesapeake Bay watershed
    McConnell, Curt A.
    Rozum, Rachel K. N.
    Shi, Yuning
    Kemanian, Armen R.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 209
  • [3] WATERSHED RESTORATION ON THE CHESAPEAKE BAY
    SWANSON, AP
    JOURNAL OF FORESTRY, 1994, 92 (08) : 37 - 38
  • [4] Visualizing the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Debate
    Schwarz, Elizabeth Anne Gervais
    ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2013, 7 (02): : 169 - 190
  • [5] Inputs of phosphorus to the Chesapeake Bay watershed
    Taylor, AW
    Pionke, HB
    AGRICULTURE AND PHOSPHORUS MANAGEMENT: THE CHESAPEAKE BAY, 2000, : 7 - 21
  • [6] Watershed fluxes of pesticides to Chesapeake Bay
    Foster, Gregory D.
    Lippa, Katrice A.
    ACS Symposium Series, 2000, 751 : 115 - 125
  • [7] Landscape ecological assessment of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Weber, T
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2004, 94 (1-3) : 39 - 53
  • [8] Chesapeake Bay program - A watershed approach to management
    Wolflin, John P.
    SUSTAINABLE USE AND DEVELOPMENT OF WATERSHEDS, 2008, : 435 - 451
  • [9] Hydroclimatic variability and change in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Seong, Chounghyun
    Sridhar, Venkataramana
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (02) : 254 - 273
  • [10] Expansion of Northern Snakehead in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
    Love, Joseph W.
    Newhard, Joshua J.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 2018, 147 (02) : 342 - 349