A duplex droplet digital PCR assay for Salmonella and Shigella and its application in diarrheal and non-diarrheal samples

被引:6
作者
Zhang, Jingyun [1 ]
Huang, Yuanming [1 ]
Xue, Panpan [1 ]
Zhan, Zhifei [2 ]
Huang, Zheng [3 ]
Li, Jie [1 ]
Diao, Baowei [1 ]
Kan, Biao [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Communicable Dis Control & Prevent, State Key Lab Infect Dis Prevent & Control, 155 Changbai Rd, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Prov Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Changsha 410005, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Changning Dist Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Shanghai 200051, Peoples R China
[4] Collaborat Innovat Ctr Diag & Treatment Infect Dis, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
关键词
Salmonella; Shigella; Droplet digital PCR; Real-time PCR; Children with diarrhea; Children without diarrhea; REAL-TIME PCR; QUANTIFICATION; SEVERITY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijid.2022.04.040
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: To evaluate a duplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay targeting Salmonella fimY and Shigella ipaH genes.Methods: The linear range, precision, analytical sensitivity, and analytical specificity of the ddPCR assay were analyzed. The ddPCR assay was compared with quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using 362 stool samples from 187 children with mild diarrhea and 175 children without diarrhea.Results: The duplex ddPCR assay showed good linearity in the range of 5.3 x 10 0 to 1.24 x 10 5 copies/reaction for Salmonella and 1.9 x 10 0 to 1.84 x 10 5 copies/reaction for Shigella . When analyzed with spiked stool samples, the limit of detection and limit of quantification were 550 and 5500 colonyforming units per mL of stool sample for Shigella , respectively, whereas both were 1.0 x 10 4 colonyforming units per mL of stool sample for Salmonella . Among 362 stool samples, more samples were detected as positive by ddPCR than by qPCR. Salmonella load was significantly higher in diarrheal samples than in non-diarrheal samples. Determined by receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff value was 1.25 x 10 4 copies/mL of stool sample to distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic Salmonella infections.Conclusion: Salmonella and Shigella prevalence may have been underestimated in the past.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 216
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2013
  • [2] Digital PCR hits its stride
    Baker, Monya
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2012, 9 (06) : 541 - 544
  • [3] The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments
    Bustin, Stephen A.
    Benes, Vladimir
    Garson, Jeremy A.
    Hellemans, Jan
    Huggett, Jim
    Kubista, Mikael
    Mueller, Reinhold
    Nolan, Tania
    Pfaffl, Michael W.
    Shipley, Gregory L.
    Vandesompele, Jo
    Wittwer, Carl T.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 55 (04) : 611 - 622
  • [4] Tolerance of Droplet-Digital PCR vs Real-Time Quantitative PCR to Inhibitory Substances
    Dingle, Tanis C.
    Sedlak, Ruth Hall
    Cook, Linda
    Jerome, Keith R.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2013, 59 (11) : 1670 - 1672
  • [5] ECDC, 2019, ANN EPIDEMIOLOGICAL
  • [6] European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, 2019, SALM MOST COMM CAUS
  • [7] Comparison between two severity scoring scales commonly used in the evaluation of rotavirus gastroenteritis in children
    Givon-Lavi, Noga
    Greenberg, David
    Dagan, Ron
    [J]. VACCINE, 2008, 26 (46) : 5798 - 5801
  • [8] A multiplex PCR assay for the detection of five human pathogenic Vibrio species and Plesiomonas
    Guan, Hongxia
    Xue, Panpan
    Zhou, Haijian
    Sha, Dan
    Wang, Duochun
    Gao, He
    Li, Jie
    Diao, Baowei
    Zhao, Hongqun
    Kan, Biao
    Zhang, Jingyun
    [J]. MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2021, 55
  • [9] Real time quantitative PCR
    Heid, CA
    Stevens, J
    Livak, KJ
    Williams, PM
    [J]. GENOME RESEARCH, 1996, 6 (10): : 986 - 994
  • [10] Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR
    Hindson, Christopher M.
    Chevillet, John R.
    Briggs, Hilary A.
    Gallichotte, Emily N.
    Ruf, Ingrid K.
    Hindson, Benjamin J.
    Vessella, Robert L.
    Tewari, Muneesh
    [J]. NATURE METHODS, 2013, 10 (10) : 1003 - +