Outcomes of reproduction following cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Wu, Jiawen [1 ]
Ye, Jianbin [2 ]
OuYang, Zhenbo [1 ]
Wana, Zixian [1 ]
Zhang, Qiushi [1 ]
Zhong, Biting [1 ]
Wei, Shiyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Second Prov Gen Hosp, Dept Gynecol, 466 XinGang Zhong Rd, Guangzhou 510317, Peoples R China
[2] Puning Peoples Hosp, Dept Intens Care Unit, Puning, Peoples R China
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; Reproductive outcomes; Recurrent cesarean scar pregnancy; UTERINE ARTERY EMBOLIZATION; LOCAL METHOTREXATE; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; 1ST-TRIMESTER DIAGNOSIS; LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SUCTION CURETTAGE; DEFECT; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To explore the reproductive outcomes of women with a history of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and the influence of various treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Study design: The PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrial.gov databases were searched for studies with the outcomes of pregnancy after CSP treatment. Studies that reported reproductive outcomes after CSP with more than 5 followed cases were included. The main data collected includes the treatment methods of CSP and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. The main information includes intrauterine pregnancy, recurrent CSP (RCSP), and spontaneous miscarriage, while the secondary information includes complications during pregnancies and the outcomes of childbirths. According to different treatments (conservative treatment, surgical treatment without resection of cesarean scar, and surgical treatment with resection of cesarean scar), a stratified analysis was carried out to compare the influence of treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Results: A total of 32 studies including 3380 cases of CSP met the inclusion criteria, of which 583 cases conceived again after treatment (including 292 cases of unexpected pregnancy), and finally 178 cases delivered successfully. The follow-up time ranged from 3 to 72 months. Among women with fertility requirements, a total of 291 cases in 403 women were successfully conceived during the follow-up period in 15 studies. Thence the pregnancy rate of women with fertility requirements was 76.2 %. Among all of the 583 successfully conceived women, 83.4 % of them had intrauterine pregnancy, while 15.3 % of cases were RCSP. The total ectopic pregnancy rate reached 16.6 %, covering RCSP and other sites of ectopic pregnancy. 14.6 % of intrauterine pregnancy experienced spontaneous miscarriage. The intrauterine pregnancy rates of the conservative treatment group, the surgical treatment without resection of cesarean scar group, and the surgical treatment with resection of cesarean scar group were 93.1 %, 80.1 % and 86.0 % respectively; the corresponding RCSP rates were 6.9 %, 15.6 % and 14.0 % respectively; and the corresponding spontaneous miscarriage rates were 20.7 %, 13.9 % and 22.2 % respectively. Conclusion: The outcomes of reproduction after CSP included intrauterine pregnancy, RCSP and other sites of ectopic pregnancy. Women with a history of CSP still have a high pregnancy rate, but the risk of RCSP and spontaneous miscarriage is also increased. It is impossible to clarify the effect of different treatments on subsequent pregnancy. Whether the resection and repair of cesarean scar can ameliorate reproductive outcomes needs to be further assessed. Further large-scale prospective studies, even RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to expound the outcomes of reproduction after CSP and the effect of different treatments on subsequent reproductive outcomes. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 92
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2019, Obstet Gynecol, V133, pe51, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003025
[2]  
[Anonymous], The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses
[3]   Reproductive outcomes of women with a previous history of Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancies [J].
Ben Nagi, J. ;
Helmy, S. ;
Ofili-Yebovi, D. ;
Yazbek, J. ;
Sawyer, E. ;
Jurkovic, D. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (07) :2012-2015
[4]   Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections [J].
Boerma, Ties ;
Ronsmans, Carine ;
Melesse, Dessalegn Y. ;
Barros, Aluisio J. D. ;
Barros, Fernando C. ;
Juan, Liang ;
Moller, Ann-Beth ;
Say, Lale ;
Hosseinpoor, Ahmad Reza ;
Yi, Mu ;
Rabello Neto, Dacio de Lyra ;
Temmerman, Marleen .
LANCET, 2018, 392 (10155) :1341-1348
[5]   The effect of dystocia and previous cesarean uterine scar on the tensile properties of the lower uterine segment [J].
Buhimschi, CS ;
Buhimschi, IA ;
Yu, CL ;
Wang, H ;
Sharer, DJ ;
Diamond, MP ;
Petkova, AP ;
Garfield, RE ;
Saade, GR ;
Weiner, CP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 194 (03) :873-883
[6]   Analysis of the Reproductive Outcome of Patients with Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Treated by High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound and Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Chen, Lixing ;
Xiao, Songshu ;
Zhu, Xiaogang ;
He, Sili ;
Xue, Min .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 26 (05) :883-890
[7]  
Chen YQ, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P21187
[8]   Risk factors associated with failure of treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Chiang, Ying-Cheng ;
Tu, Yi-An ;
Yang, Jehn-Hsiahn ;
Lin, Shin-Yu ;
Lee, Chien-Nan ;
Shih, Jin-Chung .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2017, 138 (01) :28-36
[9]   Gynecological and obstetrical outcomes after laparoscopic repair of a cesarean scar defect in a series of 38 women [J].
Donnez, Olivier ;
Donnez, Jacques ;
Orellana, Renan ;
Dolmans, Marie-Madeleine .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2017, 107 (01) :289-+
[10]   Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Experience from an Australian tertiary centre [J].
Drever, Natalie ;
Bertolone, Julia ;
Shawki, Marwan ;
Janssens, Sarah .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 60 (03) :330-335