Effect of build orientation on the strength and cost of PolyJet 3D printed parts

被引:24
作者
Das, Sai Charan [1 ]
Ranganathan, Rajesh [1 ]
Murugan, N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Coimbatore Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] PSG Coll Technol, Dept Robot & Automat Engn, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Rapid manufacturing; Additive manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Build orientation; Field emission scanning electron microscopy; PolyJet 3D printing;
D O I
10.1108/RPJ-08-2016-0137
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Purpose The main purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of build orientation on the tensile properties of PolyJet 3D printed parts. Effects on manufacturing time and total cost per part are the secondary objectives. Design/methodology/approach Solid tensile specimens were prepared as per the American Society for Testing and Materials D638 standards and were manufactured in six different orientations by using the Objet260 Connex 3D printer. VeroWhitePlus RGD835 was used as the build material, with FullCure 705 as the support material. The specimens were tested for their tensile strength and elongation. The side surface and the fracture surface were analyzed using the Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope-SIGMA HV-Carl Zeiss with Bruker Quantax 200-Z10 EDS detector. Scanning electron microscope images of each surface were obtained at various magnifications. Findings From the study, it can be concluded that build orientation has an influence on the tensile strength and the manufacturing cost of the parts. The microstructural analysis revealed that the orientation of surface cracks/voids may be the reason for the strength. Originality/value From literature survey, it is inferred that this study is sure to be among the first few under this topic. These results will help engineers to decide upon the right build orientations with respect to print head so that parts with better mechanical properties can be manufactured.
引用
收藏
页码:832 / 839
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Stainless, Heat-Resisting, Maraging, and Other Similar Chromium-Nickel-Iron Alloys, DOI DOI 10.1520/D0638-14
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Rapid Manuf. Assoc, P10, DOI [DOI 10.1520/F2792-12A.2, DOI 10.1520/F2792-12A]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, HIST ADDITIVE MANUFA
[5]  
ASHLEY S, 1991, MECH ENG, V113, P34
[6]  
ASTM, 2000, D618 ASTM
[7]  
Bagsik A., 2011, Mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling parts manufactured with ULTEM 9085. Paper presented at: 69th Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical Conference (ANTEC)
[8]  
Barclift M W., 2012, Examining variability in the mechanical properties of parts manufactured via polyjet direct 3D printing
[9]  
Castle Island, 2012, WORLDWIDE GUIDE RAPI
[10]  
Chua CheeKai., 2003, RAPID PROTOTYPING PR, DOI 10.1142/5064