Group work in healthcare students' education: what do we think we are doing?

被引:15
作者
Brown, Cary A. [1 ]
McIlroy, Kelly [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Dept Occupat Therapy, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[2] McIlroy Occupat Therapy Consulting, Sherwood Pk, AB T8B 1K5, Canada
关键词
academic assessment; collaborative learning; healthcare education; group assessment; group learning activities; healthcare students;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2010.483275
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Group learning activities (GLAs) are integral components of graduate and undergraduate programmes across disciplines. Students' multidimensional perception of GLAs and preferred learning style influences learning outcomes. Educators need to be aware of the potential for negative learning experiences associated with group activities and provide structured support and feedback to students. Routinely gathered student feedback, revealing unanticipated themes related to group assignments, provided the impetus for the authors to examine the issue in greater depth. This discussion paper will explore the critical elements of successful group learning by comparing themes emerging from analysis of these student preferences related to group learning against evidence from the literature. Student learning style, goals and past experiences with GLAs are critical determinants of the final learning outcome. To decrease negative experiences in GLAs, we recommend: use of group work in formative rather than summative projects; building student confidence by providing a step-wise introduction to GLAs with open discussion of the positive and negative consequences of conflict; and the use of effective role modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:687 / 699
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2008, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S10763-007-9075-X, 10.1007/s10763-007-9075-x]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1903, MAXIMS REVOLUTIONIST
[3]  
[Anonymous], INV REF NHS STAFF TA
[4]   The emotional impact of learning in small groups: highlighting the impact on student progression and retention [J].
Cartney, P ;
Rouse, A .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 11 (01) :79-91
[5]  
Cassidy S., 2000, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V20, P307, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/713663740, DOI 10.1080/713663740, 10.1080/713663740]
[6]   Towards effective group-work in nurse education [J].
Chapman, Helen .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2006, 26 (04) :298-303
[7]   When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning [J].
Cheng, Rebecca Wing-Yi ;
Lam, Shui-Fong ;
Chan, Joanne Chung-Yan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 78 :205-221
[8]  
Clarke B.A., 2007, Learning in Health and Social Care, V6, P202, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1473-6861.2007.00162.X
[9]  
Coffield F, 1998, SHOULD WE BE USING L
[10]  
Ford M, 2003, J INF TECHNOL, V2, P367