The genetic and environmental origins of emotional and cognitive empathy: Review and meta-analyses of twin studies

被引:74
作者
Abramson, Lior [1 ]
Uzefovsky, Florina [2 ]
Toccaceli, Virgilia [3 ]
Knafo-Noam, Ariel [1 ]
机构
[1] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Italian Natl Inst Hlth, Rome, Italy
关键词
Twin studies; Meta-analysis; Empathy; Emotional empathy; Cognitive empathy; Emotion recognition; Heritability; Shared environment; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR; INHIBITORY CONTROL; ASPERGER-SYNDROME; NEGATIVE EMPATHY; EARLY-CHILDHOOD; POSITIVE AFFECT; HERITABILITY; NEUROSCIENCE; TEMPERAMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.023
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Empathy is considered a cornerstone of human social experience, and as such has been widely investigated from psychological and neuroscientific approaches. To better understand the factors influencing individual differences in empathy, we reviewed and meta-analyzed the behavioral genetic literature of emotional empathy- sharing others' emotions (k =13), and cognitive empathy- understanding others' emotions (k = 15), as manifested in twin studies. Results showed that emotional empathy is more heritable, 48.3 % [41.3 %-50.6 %], than cognitive empathy, 26.9 % [18.1 %-35.8 %]. Moreover, cognitive empathy as examined by performance tests was affected by the environment shared by family members, 11.9 % [2.6 %-21.0 %], suggesting that emotional understanding is influenced, to some degree, by environmental factors that have similar effects on family members beyond their genetic relatedness. The effects of participants' age and the method used to asses empathy on the etiology of empathy were also examined. These findings have implications for understanding how individual differences in empathy are formed. After discussing these implications, we suggest theoretical and methodological future research directions that could potentially elucidate the relations between genes, brain, and empathy.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 133
页数:21
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
Abramson L., SOCIAL BRAIN DEV PER
[2]   From negative reactivity to empathic responding: Infants high in negative reactivity express more empathy later in development, with the help of regulation [J].
Abramson, Lior ;
Paz, Yael ;
Knafo-Noam, Ariel .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2019, 22 (03)
[3]   Is Fear in Your Head? A Comparison of Instructed and Real-Life Expressions of Emotion in the Face and Body [J].
Abramson, Lior ;
Marom, Inbal ;
Petranker, Rotem ;
Aviezer, Hillel .
EMOTION, 2017, 17 (03) :557-565
[4]   FACTOR-ANALYSIS AND AIC [J].
AKAIKE, H .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1987, 52 (03) :317-332
[5]  
Ando J, 2004, J PERS DISORD, V18, P379, DOI 10.1521/pedi.2004.18.4.379
[6]   Will you help me to suffer less? How about to feel more joy? Positive and negative empathy are associated with different other-oriented motivations [J].
Andreychik, Michael R. ;
Lewis, Eliza .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2017, 105 :139-149
[7]   Empathizing With Others' Pain Versus Empathizing With Others' Joy: Examining the Separability of Positive and Negative Empathy and Their Relation to Different Types of Social Behaviors and Social Emotions [J].
Andreychik, Michael R. ;
Migliaccio, Nicole .
BASIC AND APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 37 (05) :274-291
[8]   Perceptual and acoustic differences between authentic and acted nonverbal emotional vocalizations [J].
Anikin, Andrey ;
Lima, Cesar F. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (03) :622-641
[9]   Heritability of Individual Differences in Cortical Processing of Facial Affect [J].
Anokhin, Andrey P. ;
Golosheykin, Simon ;
Heath, Andrew C. .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 2010, 40 (02) :178-185
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Methods of metaanalysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings