Inpatient management of epistaxis: Outcomes and cost

被引:45
作者
Goddard, JC
Reiter, ER
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Hlth Syst, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Richmond, VA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.otohns.2005.02.001
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate treatments for epistaxis. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective review of Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2000). RESULTS: A total of 9778 admissions with admitting diagnosis "epistaxis" were identified. Among admissions involving 1 treatment, 454 (9.6%) received arterial ligation, 94 (2.0%) embolization, and 4188 (88.4%) nasal packing. There were no differences in length of stay, transfusions, complications, or deaths between groups (all P > 0.05). Mean total hospital charges were $6,282 for the packing group, $12,805 for the ligation group, and $17,517 for the embolization group; differences between ligation and packing groups, and embolization and packing groups demonstrated significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal packing is used commonly for epistaxis that requires inpatient management. Although embolization and arterial ligation are associated with higher hospital charges, complications, transfusion rates, and lengths of stay are similar. Further studies are needed to quantify other outcome measures, such as recurrence rates and patient quality of life. SIGNIFICANCE: Nasal packing is associated with lower hospital charges and similar complication rates as arterial ligation or embolization.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 712
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   ASPIRIN AS A THERAPEUTIC AGENT IN CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE [J].
FUSTER, V ;
DYKEN, ML ;
VOKONAS, PS ;
HENNEKENS, C .
CIRCULATION, 1993, 87 (02) :659-675
[2]   Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000 [J].
Hajjar, I ;
Kotchen, TA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02) :199-206
[3]   Surgical management of posterior epistaxis: A changing paradigm [J].
Klotz, DA ;
Winkle, MR ;
Richmon, J ;
Hengerer, AS .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2002, 112 (09) :1577-1582
[4]   Management paradigms for posterior epistaxis: A comparison of costs and complications [J].
Monte, ED ;
Belmont, MJ ;
Wax, MK .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1999, 121 (01) :103-106
[5]   CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT OF EPISTAXIS [J].
MONUX, A ;
TOMAS, M ;
KAISER, C ;
GAVILAN, J .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1990, 104 (11) :868-870
[6]   Epistaxis: A retrospective review of hospitalized patients [J].
Pollice, PA ;
Yoder, MG .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1997, 117 (01) :49-53
[7]  
ROSNAGLE R, 1983, LARYNGOSCOPE, V83, P517
[8]  
SCHAITKIN B, 1987, LARYNGOSCOPE, V97, P1392
[9]   EPISTAXIS AND ARTERIAL LIGATION [J].
SMALL, M ;
MARAN, AGD .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1984, 98 (03) :281-284
[10]   Overweight, ethnicity, and the prevalence of hypertension in school-aged children [J].
Sorof, JM ;
Lai, DJ ;
Turner, J ;
Poffenbarger, T ;
Portman, RJ .
PEDIATRICS, 2004, 113 (03) :475-482