Fresh Frozen Rib Cartilage Grafts in Revision Rhinoplasty: A 9-Year Experience

被引:36
作者
Rohrich, Rod J. [1 ]
Abraham, Jasson
Alleyne, Brendan
Bellamy, Justin
Mohan, Raja
机构
[1] Dallas Plast Surg Inst, 9101 North Cent Expressway,Suite 600, Dallas, TX 75231 USA
关键词
HOMOLOGOUS COSTAL CARTILAGE; HOMOGRAFT;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000009203
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision rhinoplasty is undoubtedly one of the most challenging procedures in facial plastic surgery. The complexity is compounded when there is a paucity of native septal cartilage to perform the required framework reconstruction. Harvest of autologous costal cartilage can result in increased operative times and possible secondary-site complications such as contour irregularity, poor scarring, and even pneumothorax. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of the senior author's (R.J.R.) patients from 2011 to 2020 who underwent primary or revision rhinoplasty. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients with fresh frozen off-the-shelf cartilage used in revision rhinoplasty only with a minimum of 6 months' follow-up. Outcomes for evaluation were warping, resorption, displacement, and infection. Results: The authors identified 226 patients who underwent open rhinoplasty with the use of fresh frozen rib cartilage grafts and met inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 12.18 months (range, 6 months to 8 years). The majority of patients had undergone one prior rhinoplasty procedure (54 percent); however, 4 percent of patients had undergone four or more prior procedures on their nose. The overall infection rate was 2.7 percent (n = 6), with the majority successfully managed with antibiotics alone (2.3 percent). Conclusions: The results in revision rhinoplasty are significantly enhanced with the creation of a stable nasal framework using off-the-shelf, easily accessible, specifically tailored fresh frozen cadaveric rib grafts. The long-term outcomes and complication rate in this 9-year retrospective study demonstrates the safety of fresh frozen rib graft in comparison to autologous or irradiated rib graft.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 62
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The rate of warping in irradiated and nonirradiated homograft rib cartilage: A controlled comparison and clinical implications [J].
Adams, WP ;
Rohrich, RJ ;
Gunter, JP ;
Clark, CP ;
Robinson, JB .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1999, 103 (01) :265-270
[2]  
Balaji S M, 2013, Ann Maxillofac Surg, V3, P20, DOI 10.4103/2231-0746.110070
[3]  
Burke Alan J C, 2004, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V6, P334
[4]  
Cakmak Ozcan, 2002, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V4, P172, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.4.3.172
[5]   Concentric and eccentric carved costal cartilage - A comparison of warping [J].
Kim, DW ;
Shah, AR ;
Toriumi, DM .
ARCHIVES OF FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2006, 8 (01) :42-46
[6]  
Kridel RWH, 2009, ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, V11, P378, DOI 10.1001/archfacial.2009.91
[7]  
Menger DJ, 2010, ARCH FACIAL PLAST S, V12, P114, DOI 10.1001/archfacial.2010.6
[8]   Role of Fresh Frozen Cartilage in Revision Rhinoplasty [J].
Mohan, Raja ;
Krishnan, R. Raja Shanmuga ;
Rohrich, Rod J. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 144 (03) :614-622
[9]  
MTF Biologics, ALL TISS INSTR US
[10]  
MTF Biologics, PROF COSTAL CART ALL