Market-led pluralism: Rethinking our understanding of racial/ethnic spatial patterning in US cities

被引:41
作者
Brown, Lawrence A. [1 ]
Chung, Su-Yuel [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Geog, Columbus, OH 43214 USA
[2] Western Illinois Univ, Dept Geog, Macomb, IL 61455 USA
关键词
ethnicity; housing; race; residential patterns; segregation;
D O I
10.1080/00045600701734612
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Vast differences between the U.S. city of today and that of a quarter-century and half-century ago call for a rethinking of conventional frameworks that provide an explanation of clustering/segregation along racial/ethnic lines. Accordingly, we put forth a new framework, market-led pluralism, that better fits today's realities. Existing frameworks-assimilation, stratification, and resurgent ethnicity-miss a central element of today's racial/ethnic residential mosaic, the market makers. At the center are housing developers who continually unveil new urban spaces with culturally open communities; lending agencies that, encouraged and supported by government policy, provide highly affordable mortgages to an increasingly wide range of households; real estate brokers and agents for whom the discriminatory practices of the past are illegal, profit reducing, and often beside the point in today's marketplace; consumers whose preferences emphasize class-type elements such as amenities in housing and neighborhood, tempered by affordability; and communities that impose their own development agenda, or lack thereof, on the housing market. The efforts of these market makers are facilitated by pervasive and fluid information (e.g., via the Web, e-mail, cell. phone); procedures that are more systematized, automated, and transparent; and well-working market mechanisms. Fleshing out market-led pluralism is done in five steps focusing on (1) building (developers-builders), (2) lending (banks, mortgage agencies, government policy and entities), (3) selling and renting (real estate practices, including discrimination), (4) consuming (buyers, renters, their preferences), and (5) local communities (annexation, zoning, development agendas, cooperative agreements among communities). Empirical support for the framework is drawn from secondary data and key-informant, protocol-driven interviews, largely focused on the Columbus, Ohio, metropolitan statistical area.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 212
页数:33
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
*ABT ASS, 2003, UPD LOW INC TAX CRED
[2]   Beyond the melting pot: Thirty-five years later [J].
Alba, R .
INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION REVIEW, 2000, 34 (01) :243-+
[3]   Immigrant groups in the suburbs: A reexamination of suburbanization and spatial assimilation [J].
Alba, RD ;
Logan, JR ;
Stults, BJ ;
Marzan, G ;
Zhang, WQ .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 64 (03) :446-460
[4]  
Alba Richard., 2003, Rethinking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration
[5]   Spatial patterns of immigrant assimilation [J].
Allen, JP ;
Turner, E .
PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 1996, 48 (02) :140-155
[6]  
ALLEN JP, 1996, ETHNICITY GEOGRAPHIC, P1
[7]  
ANDREWS EL, 2005, NY TIMES 0715
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HIGH STAKES BIG TIME
[9]  
[Anonymous], EXPANDING HOUSING OP
[10]  
[Anonymous], URBAN GEOGRAPHY