Impact of different strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on malolactic fermentation by Oenococcus oeni

被引:0
作者
Larsen, JT
Nielsen, JC
Kramp, B
Richelieu, M
Bjerring, P
Riisager, MJ
Arneborg, N
Edwards, CG [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Dairy & Food Sci, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Chr Hansen AS, Res Dev & Applicat, Horsholm, Denmark
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ENOLOGY AND VITICULTURE | 2003年 / 54卷 / 04期
关键词
Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Oenococcus oeni; SO2; malolactic fermentation; LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA; LEUCONOSTOC-OENOS; SULFUR-DIOXIDE; YEAST; WINE; GROWTH; INHIBITION; INOCULATION; CHARDONNAY; METABOLISM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The ability of different strains of wine yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) to inhibit malolactic bacteria (Oenococcus oeni) was studied using Chardonnay musts. Initial experiments indicated that the bacterial inhibition in a wine fermented by yeast V-1116 could be removed by addition of acetaldehyde or H2O2, compounds that can potentially neutralize the antibacterial properties of any SO2 produced by yeast. Malolactic fermentation was induced in fermenting grape musts or wines inoculated with different commercial strains of S. cerevisiae. Although the yeasts released < 15 to 75 mg/L total SO2, during fermentation, little if any free SO2 ( < 3 mg/L) was produced. As O. oeni was generally inhibited in wines that contained higher amounts of total SO2, the lack of free SO2 suggests that bound SO2 may be more inhibitory than previously thought. Furthermore, bacterial inhibition was strongest in wines where the majority of SO2 was not bound to acetaldehyde but bound to other unidentified molecules. However, SO2 production by yeast did not always account for the inhibition of O. oeni, and the presence of other inhibitory mechanisms is probable.
引用
收藏
页码:246 / 251
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Beelman R., 1982, P U CALIFORNIA, P109
[2]  
BEELMAN RB, 1982, DEV IND MICROBIOL, V23, P107
[3]   SULFITE-BINDING POWER OF WINES AND CIDERS .2. THEORETICAL CONSIDERATION AND CALCULATION OF SULFITE-BINDING EQUILIBRIA [J].
BURROUGHS, LF ;
SPARKS, AH .
JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 1973, 24 (02) :199-206
[4]  
CANNON MC, 1993, NZ GRAP WIN S, V8, P85
[5]  
CAPUCHO I, 1994, APPL MICROBIOL BIOT, V42, P391, DOI 10.1007/s002530050268
[6]   Inhibition of malolactic fermentation by cryotolerant yeasts [J].
Caridi, A ;
Corte, V .
BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS, 1997, 19 (08) :723-726
[7]   TOXICITY OF SULFUR-DIOXIDE TOWARDS CERTAIN LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA FROM FERMENTED APPLE JUICE [J].
CARR, JG ;
DAVIES, PA ;
SPARKS, AH .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1976, 40 (02) :201-212
[8]  
COLLINS T, 1995, OENCOLOGIE 95, P637
[9]  
DICK KJ, 1992, VITIS, V31, P105
[10]  
EDINGER WD, 1986, VINEYARD WINERY MANA, V12, P24