Wait before running for your life:: defensive tactics of spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) in evading barn owl (Tyto alba) attack

被引:43
作者
Ilany, Amiyaal [1 ]
Eilam, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Zool, IL-69978 Ramat Aviv, Israel
关键词
flight initiation distance (FID); anti-predator behavior; predator-prey interactions; predation risk;
D O I
10.1007/s00265-007-0516-x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Raptor-prey encounters were studied to evaluate the strategies and success rate of both predator attack and prey defense. We compared the success of barn owls in catching stationary simulated prey (food item) with that of moving prey (food item that was pulled in various directions). We also tracked real encounters between barn owls and spiny mice in a captive environment. It was found that owls had higher success in attacking stationary prey and that they seemed to attack the prey as soon as it became motionless. When attacked, only a few spiny mice remained immobile (freeze response) whereas most fled and usually avoided capture by the owls. It was also found that spiny mice displayed a preference to escape in those directions in which owls had demonstrated a lower success in catching the simulated prey. Escape initiation dichotomized to a short or long (but rarely intermediate) distance between the spiny mouse and the owl with more successful avoidance at short-distance (last-moment) escapes. The best predictor of escape success was the velocity of the spiny mouse, and the second best predictor was its flight initiation distance (FID). We present an update for Ydenberg and Dill's model for optimal FID in close encounters, suggesting that fleeing at the last moment is advantageous. However, a last-moment attempt to escape is also more risky with a split second differing between life and death, and is therefore appropriate mainly for agile prey under close-distance attack.
引用
收藏
页码:923 / 933
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ANIM BEHAV, V61, P271, DOI [10.1016/S0003-3472(15)00461-3, 10.1006/anbe.2000.1652]
[2]   Moving to suburbia: ontogenetic and evolutionary consequences of life on predator-free islands [J].
Blumstein, DT .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2002, 29 (5-6) :685-692
[3]   Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance [J].
Blumstein, DT .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2003, 67 (04) :852-857
[4]   Testing a key assumption of wildlife buffer zones: is flight initiation distance a species-specific trait? [J].
Blumstein, DT ;
Anthony, LL ;
Harcourt, R ;
Ross, G .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 110 (01) :97-100
[5]   SPECIES-SPECIFIC DEFENSE REACTIONS AND AVOIDANCE LEARNING [J].
BOLLES, RC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1970, 77 (01) :32-48
[6]   The influence of distance to burrow on flight initiation distance in the woodchuck, Marmota monax [J].
Bonenfant, M ;
Kramer, DL .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (03) :299-303
[7]   Effects of risk, cost, and their interaction on optimal escape by nonrefuging Bonaire whiptail lizards, Cnemidophorus murinus [J].
Cooper, WE ;
Pérez-Mellado, V ;
Baird, T ;
Baird, TA ;
Caldwell, JP ;
Vitt, LJ .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) :288-293
[8]   Tradeoffs between courtship, fighting, and antipredatory behavior by a lizard, Eumeces laticeps [J].
Cooper, WE .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 1999, 47 (1-2) :54-59
[9]   Surprise as a winter hunting strategy in Sparrowhawks Accipiter nisus, Peregrines Falco peregrinus and merlins F-columbarius [J].
Cresswell, W .
IBIS, 1996, 138 (04) :684-692
[10]   ESCAPE RESPONSES BY REDSHANKS, TRINGA-TOTANUS, ON ATTACK BY AVIAN PREDATORS [J].
CRESSWELL, W .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1993, 46 (03) :609-611