Snapchat Elicits More Jealousy than Facebook: A Comparison of Snapchat and Facebook Use

被引:142
作者
Utz, Sonja [1 ]
Muscanell, Nicole [1 ]
Khalid, Cameran [2 ]
机构
[1] Knowledge Media Res Ctr, ERC Social Media, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Glasgow, Dept Psychol, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
ROMANTIC JEALOUSY; INFORMATION; POPULARITY; GREEN;
D O I
10.1089/cyber.2014.0479
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent news in the media has suggested that younger people are using popular social media such as Facebook less and are quickly adopting newer media, such as the self-destructing app Snapchat. Snapchat is unique in that it erases messages several seconds after they have been sent, affording its users a higher level of privacy. Yet, little research exists on Snapchat use in general, let alone its broader psychological implications. This article offers a preliminary comparison of Snapchat and Facebook use and psychological effects on romantic jealousy. General motives for using Snapchat and Facebook are examined, as well as the nature of the content that Snapchat users most frequently share. Further, because of the differences in privacy and persistence of information, potential psychological effects in the domain of romantic jealousy are also examined, which has been widely studied on Facebook in the last few years. Findings show that the main difference in motives were that Snapchat was used more for flirting and finding new love interests, whereas Facebook was still the main social networking site used for keeping in touch with friends. Further, when presenting users with a series of potentially jealousy provoking scenarios, Snapchat elicited higher levels of jealousy than did Facebook. These findings are explained based on an affordance approach.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Identity concerns following a severe relational transgression: The role of discovery method for the relational outcomes of infidelity [J].
Afifi, WA ;
Falato, WL ;
Weiner, JL .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2001, 18 (02) :291-308
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SNAPCHAT IS NOW 3 SO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, ANN INT COMMUNICATIO, DOI [DOI 10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130, 10.1080/23808985.203.11679130, DOI 10.1080/23808985.203.11679130]
[4]  
Bennett S., 70 COLL STUDENTS POS
[5]  
Buunk B. P., CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS, P317
[6]   Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy [J].
Buunk, BP .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1997, 23 (06) :997-1006
[7]   Information Disclosure and Control on Facebook: Are They Two Sides of the Same Coin or Two Different Processes? [J].
Christofides, Emily ;
Muise, Amy ;
Desmarais, Serge .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 2009, 12 (03) :341-345
[8]   Private flirts, public friends: Understanding romantic jealousy responses to an ambiguous social network site message as a function of message access exclusivity [J].
Cohen, Elizabeth L. ;
Bowman, Nicholas D. ;
Borchert, Katherine .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2014, 35 :535-541
[9]  
Duggan M., 2013, Pew Research Internet Project
[10]   Time to Face It! Facebook Intrusion and the Implications for Romantic Jealousy and Relationship Satisfaction [J].
Elphinston, Rachel A. ;
Noller, Patricia .
CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2011, 14 (11) :631-635