Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) versus inpatient care in the UK: a health economic assessment for six key diagnoses

被引:37
作者
Dimitrova, Maria [1 ]
Gilchrist, Mark [2 ]
Seaton, R. A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Scottish Hlth Technol Grp, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Imperial Coll Healthcare NHS Trust, Dept Infect Pharm, London, England
[3] Queen Elizabeth Univ Hosp, Infect Dis, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Grp, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2021年 / 11卷 / 09期
关键词
infectious diseases; health economics; organisation of health services; health services administration & management; quality in health care; CLINICAL-EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049733
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare costs associated with different models of outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) delivery with costs of inpatient (IP) care across key infection groups managed via OPAT in the UK. Design A cost-minimisation design was used due to evidence of similarities in patient and treatment outcomes between OPAT and IP care. A bottom-up approach was undertaken for the evaluation of OPAT associated costs. The British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy National Outcomes Registry System was used to determine key infection diagnoses, mean duration of treatment and most frequent antibiotics used. Setting Several OPAT delivery settings were considered and compared with IP care. Interventions OPAT models considered were OP clinic model, nurse home visits, self (or carer)-administration by a bolus intravenous, self-administration by a commercially prefilled elastomeric device, continuous intravenous infusion of piperacillin with tazobactam or flucloxacillin with elastomeric device as OP once daily and, specifically for bone and joint and diabetic foot infections, complex outpatient oral antibiotic therapies. Results Base case and a range of scenario results showed all evaluated OPAT service delivery models to be less costly than IP stay of equivalent duration. The extent of savings varied by OPAT healthcare delivery models. Estimated OPAT costs as a proportion of IP costs were estimated at 0.23-0.53 (skin and soft-tissue infections), 0.34-0.46 (complex urinary tract infections), 0.23-0.51 (orthopaedic infections), 0.24-0.42 (diabetic foot infections) 0.40-0.56 (exacerbations of bronchiectasis) and 0.25-0.42 (intra-abdominal infections). Partial or full complex oral antibiotic therapies in orthopaedic or diabetic foot infections costs were estimated to be 0.13-0.26 of IP costs. Main OPAT costs were associated with staff time and antimicrobial medications. Conclusions OPAT is a cost-effective use of National Health Service resources for the treatment of a range of infections in the UK in patients who can be safely managed in a non-IP setting.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Assessment of the stability of citrate-buffered flucloxacillin for injection when stored in two commercially available ambulatory elastomeric devices: INfusor LV (Baxter) and Accufuser (Woo Young Medical): a study compliant with the NHS Yellow Cover Document (YCD) requirements
    Allwood, Michael Charles
    Stonkute, Donata
    Wallace, Andrew
    Wilkinson, Alan-Shaun
    Hills, Tim
    Jamieson, Conor
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2020, 27 (02) : 90 - 94
  • [2] BNF, 2020, BNF BRIT NAT FORM
  • [3] British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2019, NAT OUTC REG SYST NO
  • [4] Updated good practice recommendations for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) in adults and children in the UK
    Chapman, Ann L. N.
    Patel, Sanjay
    Horner, Carolyne
    Green, Helen
    Guleri, Achyut
    Hedderwick, Sara
    Snape, Susan
    Statham, Julie
    Wilson, Elizabeth
    Gilchrist, Mark
    Seaton, R. Andrew
    [J]. JAC-ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE, 2019, 1 (02):
  • [5] Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy
    Chapman, Ann L. N.
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 346
  • [6] Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a UK perspective
    Chapman, Ann L. N.
    Dixon, Simon
    Andrews, Dawn
    Lillie, Patrick J.
    Bazaz, Rohit
    Patchett, Julie D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 64 (06) : 1316 - 1324
  • [7] Department of Health, 2020, DRUGS PHARM EL MARK
  • [8] Clinical efficacy, cost analysis and patient acceptability of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT): a decade of Sheffield (UK) OPAT service
    Durojaiye, Oyewole Christopher
    Bell, Helen
    Andrews, Dawn
    Ntziora, Fotinie
    Cartwright, Katharine
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2018, 51 (01) : 26 - 32
  • [9] Assessment of the stability of citrate-buffered piperacillin/tazobactam for continuous infusion when stored in two commercially available elastomeric devices for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial chemotherapy: a study compliant with the NHS Yellow Cover Document requirements
    Jamieson, Conor
    Ozolina, Laima
    Seaton, R. Andrew
    Gilchrist, Mark
    Hills, Tim
    Drummond, F.
    Wilkinson, Alan Shaun
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2022, 29 (04) : 212 - 216
  • [10] How is income generated by outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment (OPAT) in the UK? Analysis of payment tariffs for cellulitis
    Jones, G. R.
    Cumming, D. V. E.
    Honeywell, G.
    Ball, R.
    Sanderson, F.
    Seaton, R. A.
    Healy, B.
    Hedderwick, S.
    Gilchrist, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 70 (04) : 1236 - 1240