Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: Follow-Up of First Canadian Experience with Comparison of Outcomes Between Experienced and Trainee Surgeons

被引:11
作者
Erdeljan, Petar [1 ]
Caumartin, Yves [1 ]
Warren, Jeff [1 ]
Nguan, Christopher [1 ]
Nott, Linda [1 ]
Luke, Patrick P. W. [1 ]
Pautler, Stephen E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Surg, Div Urol, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada
关键词
URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY; DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY; STANDARD; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1089/end.2009.0617
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Robot-assisted pyeloplasty (RAP) has been established recently as an option in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). We present the first Canadian experience with RAP with respect to operative results and outcomes. We compare the surgical outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons, with respect to operating room times and success rates. Patients and Methods: Eighty-eight patients underwent transperitoneal RAP for UPJO using the da Vinci robotic platform. Two surgeons performed Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty in 85 cases and YV-plasty in 5 cases. Five patients had RAP for secondary UPJO after failure of other treatments. Diuretic renography was performed at 6 weeks, and 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months postpyeloplasty. The mean follow-up was 14.1 +/- 8.5 months. Results: The mean operative time was 167.7 +/- 43.2 minutes, and the mean anastomotic time was 41.9 +/- 14.1 minutes. The mean operative duration significantly decreased with time (P < 0.05). Ten patients needed simultaneous nephroscopic stone management via the pyelotomy incision. The mean blood loss was 56.6 +/- 55.4 mL, and the mean hospital stay was 2.5 +/- 0.5 days. There were five major postoperative (stent migration, urinoma) and three minor complications that were associated with the RAP procedures. Postoperative renal scintigraphy demonstrated only four cases with persistent obstruction. Eighty-three (94.3%) patients experienced improvement of symptoms whereas 5 continued to be symptomatic. Two patients needed secondary procedures to relieve persisting obstruction. There were no statistical differences in outcomes between the experienced surgeons and trainees (P = 0.28). Conclusions: In the first large case series of RAP from Canada, we demonstrate that RAP can be performed with relatively short operative times and is safe and effective, achieving similar long-term results with standard open repair. We show that robot-assisted surgery can be safely transitioned to surgical trainees. With its cost and availability, its role in the Canadian system needs further study.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1450
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Notley R G, 1973, Br J Urol, V45, P464, DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1973.tb06804.x
[12]   The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty [J].
O'Reilly, PH ;
Brooman, PJC ;
Mak, S ;
Jones, M ;
Pickup, C ;
Atkinson, C ;
Pollard, AJ .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 87 (04) :287-289
[13]   Robotic pyeloplasty - The new standard of care? [J].
Peters, Craig A. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) :1223-1224
[14]   LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY [J].
SCHUESSLER, WW ;
GRUNE, MT ;
TECUANHUEY, LV ;
PREMINGER, GM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (06) :1795-1799
[15]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A pilot study [J].
Sung, GT ;
Gill, IS ;
Hsu, THS .
UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (06) :1099-1103
[16]   Robotic laparoscopic surgery:: A comparison of the da Vinci and Zeus Systems [J].
Sung, GT ;
Gill, IS .
UROLOGY, 2001, 58 (06) :893-898
[17]   Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what? [J].
Tan, BJ ;
Smith, AD .
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2004, 14 (02) :55-59
[18]  
Warren J, 2009, CUAJ-CAN UROL ASSOC, V3, P231
[19]   Management of adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction - Is it time for a new gold standard? [J].
Winfield, Howard N. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) :866-867
[20]   Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction [J].
Zhang, Xu ;
Li, Hong-Zhao ;
Ma, Xin ;
Zheng, Tao ;
Lang, Bin ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Fu, Bin ;
Xu, Kai ;
Guo, Xiao-Lin .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) :1077-1080