The Use of Behavior Change Theories in Dietetics Practice in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:1
作者
Rigby, Roshan R. [2 ,3 ]
Mitchell, Lana J. [2 ,3 ]
Hamilton, Kyra [2 ,3 ]
Williams, Lauren T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dietitians Assoc Australia, Deakin, ACT, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Nutr & Dietet, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
[3] Menzies Hlth Inst Queensland, Gold Coast, Qld 4222, Australia
关键词
Dietitian; Behavior change; Intervention; Primary health care; Systematic review; STYLE INTERVENTION PROGRAM; NUTRITION EDUCATION; WEIGHT-LOSS; SELF-DETERMINATION; MOTHERS DECISIONS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; COMMUNITY ELDERS; ENHANCE RECOVERY; OLDER-ADULTS; FAT INTAKE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background Behavior change theories frameworks provide the theoretical underpin- ning for effective health care. The extent to which they are applied in contemporary dietetics interventions has not been explored. Objective To systematically review the evidence of behavior change theory -based in- terventions delivered by credentialed nutrition and dietetics practitioners in primary health care settings. Methods Medline, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Psy- cINFO, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for English language, randomized controlled trials before August 2019. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta -Analysis guidelines were followed. Eligible interventions included adults (aged 18 years) receiving face-to-face dietetics care underpinned by behavior change theories in primary health care settings with outcome measures targeting changes in health be- haviors or health outcomes. Screening was conducted independently in duplicate and data were extracted using prede fined categories. The quality of each study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The body of evidence was assessed using the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Manual Conclusion Grading Table. Results Thirty articles reporting on 19 randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria, representing 5,172 adults. Thirteen studies (68%) showed signi ficant improve- ments for the primary outcome measured. Social cognitive theory was the behavior change theory most commonly applied in interventions (n=15) with 11 finding sig- ni ficant intervention effects. Goal setting, problem solving, social support, and self - monitoring were the most commonly reported techniques (n=15, n=14, n=11, and n=11, respectively). Most studies had a high (n=11) or unclear (n=8) risk of bias. There was fair evidence (Grade II) supporting the use of behavior change theories to inform development of dietetics interventions. Conclusions Interventions delivered by credentialed nutrition and dietetics practi- tioners that were underpinned by behavior change theories and utilizing various behavior change techniques were found to have potential to be more effective at improving patient health outcomes than dietary interventions without theoretical un- derpinnings. Findings from this review should inform future primary health care research in the area of dietary behavior change. In addition, findings from this review highlight the need for stronger documentation of use of behavior change theory and techniques that map on to the theory within dietetics practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1172 / 1197
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hypnosis in Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Cramer, Holger
    Lauche, Romy
    Paul, Anna
    Langhorst, Jost
    Kuemmel, Sherko
    Dobos, Gustav J.
    INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES, 2015, 14 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [22] Teaming in Interdisciplinary Chronic Pain Management Interventions in Primary Care: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Connell, Natalie B.
    Prathivadi, Pallavi
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    Zupanc, Sophia N.
    Singer, Sara J.
    Krebs, Erin E.
    Yano, Elizabeth M.
    Wong, Hong-nei
    Giannitrapani, Karleen F.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 37 (06) : 1501 - 1512
  • [23] Walking Interventions and Cognitive Health in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lee, Jongwon
    West, Delia
    Pellegrini, Christine
    Wei, Jingkai
    Wilcox, Sara
    Neils-Strunjas, Jean
    Rudisill, A. Caroline
    Friedman, Daniela B.
    Marquez, David X.
    Dzwierzynski, Jenna
    Balls-Berry, Joyce
    Gajadhar, Rachelle
    Yang, Chih-Hsiang
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2025,
  • [24] Rehabilitation of Cognitive Deficits Poststroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    O'Donoghue, Mairead
    Leahy, Siobhan
    Boland, Pauline
    Galvin, Rose
    McManus, John
    Hayes, Sara
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (05) : 1700 - 1710
  • [25] APPLICABILITY OF EVIDENCE FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
    Malmivaara, Antti
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2021, 53 (06)
  • [26] A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback
    Heather L Colquhoun
    Jamie C Brehaut
    Anne Sales
    Noah Ivers
    Jeremy Grimshaw
    Susan Michie
    Kelly Carroll
    Mathieu Chalifoux
    Kevin W Eva
    Implementation Science, 8
  • [27] Examining the use of process evaluations of randomised controlled trials of complex interventions addressing chronic disease in primary health care-a systematic review protocol
    Liu H.
    Muhunthan J.
    Hayek A.
    Hackett M.
    Laba T.-L.
    Peiris D.
    Jan S.
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [28] A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback
    Colquhoun, Heather L.
    Brehaut, Jamie C.
    Sales, Anne
    Ivers, Noah
    Grimshaw, Jeremy
    Michie, Susan
    Carroll, Kelly
    Chalifoux, Mathieu
    Eva, Kevin W.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2013, 8
  • [29] Health effects of green prescription: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Adewuyi, Fatai A.
    Knobel, Pablo
    Gogna, Priyanka
    Dadvand, Payam
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 236
  • [30] Evaluating energy behavior change programs using randomized controlled trials: Best practice guidelines for policymakers
    Frederiks, Elisha R.
    Stenner, Karen
    Hobman, Elizabeth V.
    Fischle, Mark
    ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2016, 22 : 147 - 164